Combine Harvester Driver Assistance System Simultaneous Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing driver assistance systems for agricultural combines are inefficient in optimizing multiple quality criteria simultaneously, requiring sequential optimization and diverting operator attention from the harvesting process.

Innovation Solution

The system configures an arithmetic logic unit to present multiple areas of improvement simultaneously, providing resolution criteria and indicating control actions to improve these areas, allowing for simultaneous optimization of grain quality, grain loss, and straw condition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If sequential optimization of working parameters is performed, then each parameter can be optimized individually, but the time required to reach optimized operating state becomes excessively long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization precisionVSAvoidtime to reach optimized state
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple working parameters into parameter groups that are optimized simultaneously. The arithmetic logic unit processes multiple parameters together rather than sequentially, merging the optimization of several parameters into a single coordinated operation that reduces total adjustment time while maintaining optimization precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts multiple working parameters based on real-time sensor feedback and their interrelationships. The arithmetic logic unit continuously monitors parameter interactions and makes coordinated adjustments, allowing the system to adapt dynamically rather than following a fixed sequential procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If the operator performs manual adjustments based on complex parameter interactions, then optimization can be achieved, but the process becomes highly dependent on operator knowledge and skill

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization resultVSAvoidoperator dependency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-optimization through the arithmetic logic unit that automatically processes sensor signals, determines optimal parameter settings, and controls working mechanisms without requiring operator intervention for complex calculations. The system serves itself by autonomously handling the complex parameter interactions that previously required expert operator knowledge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of manual operator adjustment with an automated computational system. The arithmetic logic unit substitutes for the operator's cognitive processing, using algorithms to analyze parameter relationships and determine optimal settings, thereby eliminating dependency on operator knowledge while maintaining or improving optimization precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of time

If multiple working parameters are adjusted simultaneously, then optimization time is reduced, but the complexity of coordinating parameter interactions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustment timeVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments working parameters into logical groups that can be adjusted simultaneously while managing complexity. The arithmetic logic unit divides the overall optimization task into manageable parameter groups, processing them in an organized manner that enables parallel adjustment without overwhelming system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The arithmetic logic unit acts as an intermediary that coordinates the simultaneous adjustment of multiple working parameters. It processes the complex interrelationships between parameters and translates them into coordinated control signals, mediating between the need for simultaneous adjustment and the requirement for controlled complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Manufacturing precision

If the operator must monitor and adjust multiple parameters, then comprehensive optimization is possible, but operator attention is diverted from the harvesting process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality criteria optimizationVSAvoidharvesting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system autonomously monitors and optimizes multiple quality criteria without requiring continuous operator attention. The arithmetic logic unit continuously processes sensor data and adjusts working parameters automatically, allowing the operator to focus on the harvesting process while the system serves itself in maintaining optimal performance across multiple quality metrics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP2837279B1Driver assistance system
Publication Date: 2021.06.09 DEERE & CO
  • EP2837279B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2837279B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2837279B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A driver assistance system (200) for a combine harvester (102) includes an arithmetic logic unit (202) configured to receive two or more desired areas of improvement from an operator, and to calculate at least one control action that will improve the two or more areas of improvement.