Combined Fill and Safety Vent Plug for Pressure Tanks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional small gas tanks for propane and butane require separate ports for fill and vent valves, increasing cost, complexity, and safety concerns, especially during refilling, as the vent valve can direct a blast of gas at the user and necessitate additional components like dip tubes for overfill prevention.

Innovation Solution

A combined fill and safety vent plug with a single port integrates a vent valve, fill valve, and dip tube, featuring a valve housing with a vent valve socket, fill valve socket, and overflow channel, allowing safe, simple, and compact refilling without special equipment, with the dip tube indicating full capacity and preventing overfilling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If separate ports are used for fill and vent valves, then each valve can function independently and reliably, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve function reliabilityVSAvoidnumber of ports
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the fill valve and vent valve into a single integrated valve assembly that fits within one port. The valve body includes both a fill valve and a vent valve mounted on the same valve housing, allowing both functions to be performed through a single port penetration in the tank wall, thereby reducing the number of ports required while maintaining independent valve functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single port serves multiple functions by housing both the fill valve and vent valve within the same port opening. The valve assembly is designed so that one port performs the roles of what would traditionally require two separate ports, achieving multi-functionality without compromising the independent operation of each valve

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of manufacture

If the vent valve is positioned to vent directly out of the port axially, then the venting function is simple and direct, but it exposes the user to a direct facially-aimed blast of gas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveventing simplicityVSAvoiduser exposure to gas blast
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The vent valve is designed with asymmetric orientation where the vent opening is angled relative to the port axis rather than being directly axial. This asymmetric configuration directs the vented gas away from the user's face while the user fills the tank, maintaining simple venting functionality while eliminating the harmful direct blast exposure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of having the vent valve discharge gas in the conventional axial direction toward the user, the vent opening is inverted or redirected to discharge in a different direction (laterally or at an angle), thereby inverting the harmful effect and protecting the user from direct exposure while maintaining effective pressure relief

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If a dip tube is added to prevent overfilling, then overfill protection is provided, but the device complexity and number of ports increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverfill protectionVSAvoidnumber of ports
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The dip tube is integrated into the same port assembly as the fill and vent valves, combining multiple safety and filling functions within a single port. The dip tube extends into the tank to provide overfill protection by allowing liquid to escape through a separate pathway while sharing the same port mounting location, thereby avoiding the need for an additional dedicated overflow port

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a safe, reliable, and cost-effective means for refilling small gas tanks by integrating fill and vent functions in one port, reducing safety risks and complexity while ensuring accurate filling and overfill protection.

Implementation Method 1

The fill valve is often a conventional spring biased pin valve of the type that is often described as a Schrader valve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring bias: Spring

Implementation Method 2

Conventional vent valves include a seal that is spring biased into the closed configuration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring bias: Spring

Implementation Method 3

Pressure on the tank side of the valve will overcome the spring bias and open the vent valve when the pressure in the interior of the tank exceeds the predetermined safe pressure limit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS8479767B2Combined fill and safety vent plug
Publication Date: 2013.07.09 LEHR IP LLC
  • US8479767B2 patent drawing
  • US8479767B2 patent drawing
  • US8479767B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A combined fill and safety vent plug adapted to being mounted in a port in a pressure tank. A valve housing member is adapted to being mounted in a port in a pressure vessel. A fill valve is located in a fill valve socket in the valve housing member. A vent valve and an overflow system are also provided in the valve housing member. All of the functions of filling, venting, dispensing, and overflow protection are provided by elements contained in one single plug in one single port in a pressure vessel. For safety purposes, the vent valve dumps excess fluid generally laterally of the valve housing member.