Hierarchical Specification for Combined Print Product Workflows

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for creating and processing combined print products are incomplete, as they fail to provide a structured overview of the production process for operators, especially when dealing with multiple sub-products that require both printing and finishing actions, often omitting crucial digital and physical resources.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced that creates a digital hierarchical structure to organize production parts into categories such as devices, actions, resources, and logical concepts, allowing for a user-friendly interface to visualize and manage the production process of combined print products, enabling flexible arrangement and combination of parts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a workflow system comprises printing and finishing actions, then the production process is defined, but the printing device and finishing device are not determined, making it incomplete

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow creation easeVSAvoidworkflow specification completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The workflow specification is segmented into distinct components: printing actions, finishing actions, and device assignments. Each action type can be independently defined and then linked to specific devices, allowing the workflow to be built step-by-step without requiring complete device information upfront.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows preliminary definition of printing and finishing actions before device assignment. Users can first outline the production steps needed, then subsequently assign appropriate devices to each action, separating the planning phase from the device configuration phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If digital resources and physical resources are omitted from the workflow system, then the system remains simple, but the overview for operators becomes cumbersome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structure simplicityVSAvoidoperator overview quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges digital resources (documents, images) and physical resources (media, finished products) into a single unified workflow model. This integration allows operators to view and manage all resources within one interface, eliminating the need to switch between separate systems while maintaining a clean, organized structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The workflow system is designed to handle multiple resource types (digital and physical) through a universal interface and data structure. The same workflow framework accommodates printing actions on digital documents, finishing actions on physical media, and the interconnections between them, providing a multi-functional solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the combined print product comprises multiple sub-products, then the product functionality is enhanced, but the specification and overview become cumbersome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct combination flexibilityVSAvoidspecification structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The combined print product is segmented into distinct sub-products, each with its own printing and finishing actions. The system recursively processes each sub-product independently, allowing complex multi-product workflows to be broken down into manageable, standardized units that can be specified using the same template.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The workflow specification uses a nested structure where combined print products contain sub-products, which themselves may contain further nested elements. This hierarchical organization allows the system to manage complexity by nesting similar structures within each other, with each level following the same specification pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS9910625B2Method for creating specifications for a combined print product processing system
Publication Date: 2018.03.06 CANON PRODUCTION PRINTING NETHERLANDS BV
  • US9910625B2 patent drawing
  • US9910625B2 patent drawing
  • US9910625B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for creating and processing specifications for a combined print product includes determining a plurality of parts needed to produce the combined print product, selecting a corresponding digital representation of the determined part from a digital representation collection, displaying the digital representations, and creating a digital hierarchical structure of the digital representations. An order in the digital hierarchical structure defines usage of the parts, appliance of the parts and a combination of the parts in a production process of the combined print product. Each part of the plurality of parts belongs to a part category out of a set of part categories, and the plurality of parts includes at least two resources, at least one device action, at least one finishing action, at least one combination action, at least one device and at least two logical concepts. A combined print product processing system is configured to apply the method.