Gas Turbine Combustor Effusion Cooling via Additive Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing combustors for gas turbine engines face challenges in effectively cooling complex geometries, which can lead to overheating and reduced component lifespan, particularly due to the difficulty in machining or casting effusion cooling holes.

Innovation Solution

A combustor design featuring an outer and inner liner with a double wall structure and an effusion cooling system, where the liners are additively manufactured to include complex geometries that facilitate improved cooling, allowing for the integration of effusion cooling holes without the need for supports and reducing maintenance costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If traditional machining or casting methods are used to create effusion cooling holes, then the manufacturing process is simpler, but complex geometries cannot be achieved and cooling efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometry complexity of effusion cooling holesVSAvoidmanufacturing difficulty of effusion cooling holes
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the manufacturing method from traditional machining/casting to additive manufacturing, which fundamentally alters the capability to create complex geometries. Additive manufacturing enables the creation of effusion cooling holes with complex three-dimensional geometries that cannot be achieved through conventional methods, directly resolving the contradiction between geometry complexity and manufacturing ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Temperature

If effusion cooling holes with complex geometry are implemented, then cooling efficiency is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiency of combustor componentsVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from conventional manufacturing to additive manufacturing, changing the process parameters and capabilities. This enables the creation of complex effusion cooling hole geometries that improve cooling efficiency while the additive manufacturing process itself handles the complexity, avoiding the need for complex assembly procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the effusion cooling holes with the combustor liner as a single integrated component manufactured in one piece through additive manufacturing. This merging eliminates the need for separate manufacturing and assembly processes for the cooling holes, reducing manufacturing process complexity while maintaining geometric complexity for improved cooling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Duration of action of stationary object

If combustor components are cooled to prevent overheating, then component lifespan is extended, but the manufacturing process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuseful life of combustor componentsVSAvoidmanufacturing process simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates the effusion cooling system directly into the combustor liner through additive manufacturing, creating a single monolithic component. This integration ensures that cooling functionality is built-in from manufacturing, extending component lifespan through effective cooling while avoiding the complexity of separate cooling system assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances cooling efficiency, extends the lifespan of combustor components, and reduces maintenance costs by enabling the use of additive manufacturing to create complex geometries within the combustor, allowing for effective heat management and operation in high-temperature environments.

Implementation Method 1

the combustor may include effusion cooling holes to assist in cooling the combustor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEffusion cooling: Porosity

Data Source

PatentEP4047273B1Combustor for gas turbine engine and method of manufacture
Publication Date: 2024.11.20 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • EP4047273B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4047273B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4047273B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A combustor (200) for a gas turbine engine includes an outer liner (202) having a first end interconnected to an opposite second end by an outer liner wall (214) composed of a plurality of outer segments. The inner liner (204) has a first inner end interconnected to an opposite second inner end by an inner liner wall (304) composed of a plurality of inner segments. The outer liner wall (214) and the inner liner wall define a combustion chamber (206), and each of the outer wall segments extend at an angle of at least 40 degrees relative to a longitudinal axis. The outer wall segments include a first segment (218), a second segment (220) that extends at a second angle relative to the first segment (218), which is less than a third angle defined between the second segment (220) and a third segment (222) and is substantially the same as a fourth angle defined between the third segment (222) and a fourth segment (224).