Communications Device Link Status Validation for Network Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wired communications networks face disruptions due to link failures, which can compromise network security if network parameters are altered without proper validation, as malicious devices can exploit changes in parameters to compromise the network.

Innovation Solution

A method where communications devices monitor link status information to grant or deny requests for changing network parameters, ensuring that changes are only made when a link failure is detected, thereby preventing unauthorized modifications that could compromise security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If network parameters are changed to compensate for link failures, then network reliability is improved, but network security deteriorates due to potential malicious exploitation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork reliabilityVSAvoidnetwork security
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of link failures and stores status information before any network parameter changes are made. This preliminary action establishes a baseline that prevents malicious devices from triggering unauthorized parameter changes, thus resolving the contradiction by enabling reliable compensation while maintaining security through pre-established validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where link status information is continuously monitored and used to validate requests for network parameter changes. This feedback loop ensures that only legitimate failure-compensating changes are permitted, resolving the contradiction by providing reliability through adaptive parameter changes while maintaining security through validation against stored status information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If network parameters are adapted to handle link failures, then network adaptability is improved, but network security deteriorates due to vulnerability to malicious parameter changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork adaptabilityVSAvoidnetwork security
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system stores link status information in advance before any adaptability-driven parameter changes occur. This preliminary recording creates a reference that enables legitimate adaptation while preventing malicious exploitation, resolving the contradiction by allowing necessary network adaptability while securing against unauthorized changes through pre-established status validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from stored link status information to validate and control network parameter adaptations. This feedback mechanism ensures that adaptability is exercised only when justified by actual link failures, resolving the contradiction by enabling versatile network response to failures while preventing security vulnerabilities through validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If network parameter changes are allowed to compensate for link failures, then network reliability is improved, but the risk of malicious activity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork reliabilityVSAvoidmalicious activity risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection and storage of link failure status before allowing any network parameter changes. This preliminary action creates a trusted reference that enables reliable compensation while blocking malicious activity, resolving the contradiction by establishing security validation in advance that permits legitimate reliability improvements while preventing harmful exploits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback validation where stored link status information is used to verify requests for network parameter changes. This feedback mechanism ensures that only genuine failure-compensating changes are permitted, resolving the contradiction by providing reliability through necessary parameter adaptations while reducing malicious activity risk through validation against stored status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11637743B2Communications device and method of communications
Publication Date: 2023.04.25 NXP BV
  • US11637743B2 patent drawing
  • US11637743B2 patent drawing
  • US11637743B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of a device and method are disclosed. In an embodiment, a method of communications involves at a communications device, receiving a request for changing a network parameter of the communications device and at the communications device, granting or denying the request based on link status information that is stored in the communications device, where the link status information specifies a link failure status of a communications link within a wired communications network that involves the communication device.