Command Analytics Service for IoT Deployment Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

IoT devices face vulnerabilities due to software bugs, unencrypted transmissions, weak encryption, and invalid or out-of-sequence commands, which existing management techniques fail to adequately protect, posing risks to continuous operation and system stability.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a Command Analytics Service (CoAS) that collects and validates command sequences by comparing them against historical data or learned patterns, generating alerts for invalid or out-of-sequence commands, and performing remedial actions to ensure only valid and correctly sequenced commands are executed, while preserving privacy and operating in both offline and online modes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing IoT device management techniques are used, then device operation is maintained, but devices remain vulnerable to invalid and out-of-sequence commands that can compromise security and stability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice operation stabilityVSAvoidvulnerability to invalid commands
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation of commands by comparing them against learned deployment patterns before execution. The command analytics service pre-establishes what valid command sequences should look like based on historical data, and then proactively checks incoming commands against these patterns to prevent invalid commands from executing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring command sequences, comparing them against learned patterns, and generating alerts when anomalies are detected. This feedback loop allows the system to adapt to new deployments and refine its understanding of valid command sequences over time, improving security while maintaining operational reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If command validation against historical data is implemented, then security against invalid commands is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommand validityVSAvoidanalytics service structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The command analytics service is designed to automatically learn deployment patterns from historical command data without requiring manual configuration or human intervention. The system self-configures by analyzing past command sequences and autonomously establishing validation rules, which reduces the operational complexity despite the enhanced security functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If automatic learning of deployment patterns is implemented, then adaptability to new deployments is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment pattern recognitionVSAvoidlearning and validation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs pattern learning in advance by analyzing historical command data during deployment initialization. Once the deployment patterns are learned and stored, subsequent command validation operates against these pre-established patterns rather than requiring continuous learning, significantly reducing the time overhead for each command validation event.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10063577B2Securing deployments using command analytics
Publication Date: 2018.08.28 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10063577B2 patent drawing
  • US10063577B2 patent drawing
  • US10063577B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and computer program products for securing deployments using command analytics are provided herein. A computer-implemented method includes collecting command sequences sent from one or more applications to one or more of a distributed group of multiple devices within a network; detecting one or more invalid command sequences and/or one or more out-of-sequence command sequences among the collected command sequences, wherein said detecting comprises comparing the collected command sequences against a repository of historical data of valid command sequences pertaining to the distributed group of multiple devices within the network; generating an alert upon a determination that one of the collected command sequences does not match an entry in the repository; and performing one or more remedial actions based on the generated alert.