Command Line Script Automation via Pattern Distance Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing command line interfaces do not effectively automate repetitive tasks by identifying and utilizing patterns in command line histories to generate scripts, leading to inefficiencies in user interaction.

Innovation Solution

A method that determines distances between commands in a command line history, groups similar commands into sets based on these distances, and creates scripts when the distance between command sets is below a predetermined threshold, allowing for automated execution of common command sequences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If command line interfaces process commands individually without pattern recognition, then each command is executed accurately, but repetitive tasks require manual re-entry and user effort increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of repetitive tasksVSAvoidcomplexity of command processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of command line history to identify patterns and generate scripts before users need to execute repetitive tasks. By pre-processing historical commands and creating automated scripts in advance, the system eliminates the need for manual re-entry of common command sequences, thereby improving productivity without requiring users to interact with complex processing mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates simplified script copies of frequently executed command sequences from the command line history. Instead of processing complex individual commands each time, the system generates reusable script templates that capture common patterns, allowing users to execute automated versions of repetitive tasks while the system handles the complexity of pattern matching and script generation in the background.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If the system analyzes command line history to identify patterns, then script generation capability improves, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescript generation capabilityVSAvoidprocessing time for pattern analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial analysis by focusing on identifying the most common and useful command patterns rather than analyzing every possible command sequence. By targeting only the most frequent patterns that provide the greatest automation benefit, the system achieves effective script generation capability while limiting processing time and computational resources to what is necessary for high-impact patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system generates lightweight, simple scripts from command patterns rather than creating complex processing structures. These scripts are easy to store, execute, and modify, requiring minimal computational resources to maintain. The simplicity of the generated scripts allows for rapid pattern analysis and script creation without significant time or resource investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Extent of automation

If the system groups commands into sets based on distance metrics, then automated script creation improves, but computational complexity of distance calculation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated script creationVSAvoidcomplexity of distance calculation
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms complex command structures into simplified parameter representations that capture essential characteristics for pattern matching. By converting commands into standardized parameter formats, the system enables efficient distance calculations and grouping operations. This parameter transformation reduces computational complexity while maintaining the ability to identify meaningful patterns for automated script creation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system divides command line history into discrete, manageable command units and groups them into sets based on calculated distances. By segmenting the command history and processing commands in smaller batches rather than analyzing entire histories at once, the system achieves effective automated script creation while reducing the computational burden of distance calculations through divide-and-conquer processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12020048B2Creating scripts from command line history
Publication Date: 2024.06.25 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12020048B2 patent drawing
  • US12020048B2 patent drawing
  • US12020048B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein are a method, system, and computer program product for creating scripts from command line history. The method includes determining a plurality of distances among a plurality of commands from a command line history. A plurality of command sets is determined from the plurality of commands based on the plurality of distances among the plurality of commands. Each of the plurality of command sets includes at least two neighboring commands. A script is created by the one or more processors based on a first command set and a second command set of the plurality of command sets in response to a distance between the first command set and the second command set being less than a predetermined threshold.