Command Processor Ray Tracing Shader Dispatch

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current ray tracing techniques are computationally expensive and lack efficient orchestration methods, leading to overhead in launching shader programs that perform no work, which affects rendering performance.

Innovation Solution

A command processor executes custom instructions to orchestrate a ray tracing pipeline by managing recursion depth and shader execution through a loop iteration mechanism, where each iteration performs ray tracing operations and updates recursion depth based on trace results, ensuring efficient execution of shader programs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional ray tracing techniques are used, then rendering accuracy is improved, but computational cost and overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverendering accuracyVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the ray tracing pipeline into distinct shader stages (ray generation, any hit, closest hit, miss shaders) that can be independently managed and executed. Each shader program is launched as a separate workgroup, allowing the system to selectively execute only the necessary shaders for each ray tracing operation, thereby reducing unnecessary computational overhead while maintaining rendering accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The command processor performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring shader queues and preparing workgroup launch parameters before actual ray tracing execution. The system pre-organizes shader programs in queues and sets up recursion depth tracking in advance, enabling efficient dispatching and reducing runtime overhead during the actual rendering process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional shader launch methods are used, then shader execution flexibility is maintained, but overhead from launching shaders that perform no work increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshader execution flexibilityVSAvoidrendering performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through recursion depth tracking and shader queue management. The command processor monitors which shaders are actually executed and uses this information to optimize subsequent shader launches. By tracking recursion depth and managing shader queues dynamically, the system avoids launching shaders that would perform no work, thereby improving rendering performance while maintaining execution flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts shader execution based on runtime conditions. The command processor dynamically manages shader queues, adjusts workgroup launch parameters, and controls recursion depth based on actual ray tracing needs. This dynamic approach allows the system to maintain shader execution flexibility while eliminating unnecessary shader launches that would degrade performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If recursion depth is increased for accurate ray tracing, then rendering quality improves, but computational overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveray tracing accuracyVSAvoidcomputational overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary setup of recursion depth tracking and shader queue configuration before entering the ray tracing loop. By pre-configuring the maximum recursion depth and setting up the shader dispatch mechanism in advance, the system minimizes runtime overhead even when operating at higher recursion depths for improved rendering quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuous useful action by efficiently managing the ray tracing loop at each recursion depth. The command processor continuously dispatches appropriate shaders based on the current recursion depth and shader queue contents, ensuring that computational resources are consistently utilized for productive ray tracing operations rather than being wasted on overhead or idle shader launches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS11481953B2Command processor based multi dispatch scheduler
Publication Date: 2022.10.25 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
  • US11481953B2 patent drawing
  • US11481953B2 patent drawing
  • US11481953B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are techniques for performing ray tracing operations. A command processor executes custom instructions for orchestrating a ray tracing pipeline. The custom instructions cause the command processor to perform a series of loop iterations, each at a particular recursion depth. In a first loop iteration, a ray generation shader is executed that triggers execution of a trace ray operation. In any other iteration, zero or more shaders are executed based on the contents of a shader queue. Any shader may trigger execution of a trace ray operation. The trace ray operation determines whether a ray specified by the shader intersects a triangle. The ray trace operation places shader entries into a shader queue, at the current recursion depth plus 1. The command processor updates the current recursion depth based on whether a trace ray operation is executed. The loop ends when the recursion depth is less than a threshold.