Command Management System Reliability Scoring
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Complex systems that receive user input from multiple devices of varying reliability face challenges in preventing unintentional actions, as conventional solutions require separate reliability components and verification strategies for each device, leading to increased complexity and cost.
Innovation Solution
A command management system that determines the criticality level of each command and assigns a reliability score to each input device, generating a request reliability score for each command and comparing it to the criticality level before transmission, ensuring only reliable commands are executed.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If separate reliability components and verification strategies are implemented for each input device, then command execution reliability is improved, but device complexity and system cost increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements a universal reliability component that serves all input devices through a common architecture. The system uses standardized interface modules that can handle multiple input device types (tactile, voice, gesture, etc.) through unified reliability scoring and verification mechanisms, eliminating the need for separate dedicated components for each device while maintaining comprehensive reliability control.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent merges multiple verification strategies into a unified reliability management system. By combining device reliability scores, command criticality levels, and contextual verification requirements into a single integrated framework, the system achieves comprehensive reliability control without the overhead of separate verification systems for each input device.
2Measurement precision
If separate interfaces are dedicated to each user input device, then command verification accuracy is improved, but real estate requirements and testing complexity increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent employs universal interface modules that can handle multiple input device types through standardized protocols. These modules provide accurate command verification for tactile, voice, gesture, and other input modalities without requiring separate physical interfaces, thereby reducing system real estate while maintaining verification accuracy through unified reliability scoring.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces intermediary interface modules that act as mediators between diverse input devices and the core reliability system. These modules standardize input from various device types, enabling accurate verification without requiring dedicated interfaces for each device, thus reducing overall system complexity and space requirements.
3Reliability
If multiple dedicated interfaces are implemented for each input device, then command reliability control is improved, but quality assurance procedures and testing complexity increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements universal interface modules with standardized reliability scoring mechanisms that work across all input device types. This unified approach simplifies quality assurance and testing by providing consistent verification procedures rather than requiring separate testing protocols for each device type, thereby reducing QA complexity while maintaining reliable command control.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent uses parameter-based reliability scoring that adapts to different input devices through configurable thresholds and weights. By changing parameters rather than implementing separate verification systems, the patent achieves device-specific reliability control through a unified framework, significantly simplifying testing and quality assurance procedures.
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
AI summary
Systems and methods capable of increasing reliability of received commands across a variety of different kinds of input devices and modalities are provided. The provided systems and methods easily expand to support additional input devices, and easily adapt to a wide variety of command destinations, such as subsystems and components. The provided systems and methods employ command specific verification strategies before transmitting the command to its destination. The provided systems and methods also concurrently support a wide variety of command destinations, such as subsystems and components.