Prioritizing Medical Comment-on-Findings Search Results

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for searching medical image comments-on-findings with concise queries face challenges in quickly identifying desired results due to the increased number and variability of search results, making it difficult for users to find relevant information efficiently.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus and method that evaluates and prioritizes comment-on-findings candidates based on predetermined importance, grouping and sub-grouping them by diagnostic information and factuality, and presenting the most relevant results to the user, allowing for concise search queries to yield accurate and relevant findings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a concise search query is used, then the search input efficiency is improved, but the number and variations of search results increase, making it more difficult to quickly find desired comments on findings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch input efficiencyVSAvoidtime to find desired comments
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining importance levels for various combinations of diagnostic information and finding information before the search occurs. When a search query is submitted, the system immediately retrieves pre-evaluated comment-on-findings candidates and presents them in advance sorted by importance, eliminating the need for users to manually filter through unsorted results and reducing search time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of result presentation by introducing an importance evaluation dimension. Instead of presenting all search results equally, the system assigns different importance levels to different comment-on-findings candidates based on their diagnostic information and finding information combinations, thereby prioritizing the most relevant results for the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the search query is made more detailed, then the accuracy of search results is improved, but the search input time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch result accuracyVSAvoidsearch input time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically evaluating and ranking comment-on-findings candidates based on pre-defined importance criteria. The system independently determines which results are most relevant without requiring users to manually adjust search parameters or filter results, thereby maintaining high search result accuracy while reducing user input time and effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Quantity of substance

If all comment-on-findings candidates are presented, then the completeness of information is improved, but the difficulty of identifying relevant information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of search resultsVSAvoiddifficulty of identifying relevant information
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the comment-on-findings candidates into different importance levels or categories based on their diagnostic information and finding information characteristics. By dividing the results into prioritized groups, the system maintains information completeness while making it easier for users to identify relevant information by presenting the most important segments first.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by assigning different presentation weights to different comment-on-findings candidates based on their specific characteristics. Important combinations of diagnostic and finding information receive higher visibility and prioritization, while less important results are downgraded, thereby maintaining completeness while improving detectability of relevant information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250104867A1Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and information processing program
Publication Date: 2025.03.27 FUJIFILM CORP
  • US20250104867A1 patent drawing
  • US20250104867A1 patent drawing
  • US20250104867A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus including at least one processor, wherein the processor is configured to: search for a plurality of comment-on-findings candidates related to a search query from a comment-on-findings group including a plurality of comments on findings; evaluate each of the comment-on-findings candidates based on importance predetermined for each combination of diagnostic information and finding information included in the comment-on-findings candidates; and present at least one of the comment-on-findings candidates based on a result of the evaluation.