Comment Map and Hint Navigation for Collaborative Document Review

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In collaborative editing of electronic documents, navigating and reviewing scattered comments across a large document can be cumbersome, especially when multiple users contribute comments, making it difficult for users to efficiently identify and review relevant comments.

Innovation Solution

An end user application on a local client computer stores comment data, including comment threads, and provides hints and a comment map to facilitate navigation, allowing users to filter and quickly review comments based on various criteria, with hints offering information about next and previous comments outside the current context and a spatial representation of comment distribution within the document.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If comments are distributed throughout a large electronic document to provide contextual information, then the completeness of comment coverage is improved, but the ease of navigation and review of comments deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomment coverage completenessVSAvoidcomment navigation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the distributed comments into organized comment threads grouped by their associated document locations. The interface divides comments into manageable sections with hierarchical organization, allowing users to navigate through structured comment groups rather than scattered individual comments throughout the document.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary comment navigation interface that sits between the user and the distributed comments in the document. This intermediary layer provides centralized comment panels, thread hierarchies, and navigation controls that mediate access to scattered comments, making them easier to locate and review without changing the document's comment distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If multiple editors add comments to shared electronic documents to enhance collaboration, then the richness of feedback and review information is improved, but the complexity of managing and reviewing all comments increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback information richnessVSAvoidcomment management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges comments from multiple editors into unified comment threads associated with specific document locations. Instead of presenting separate comments from different users as isolated elements, the system combines them into threaded conversations grouped by location, reducing the perceived complexity while preserving all feedback information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal comment management interface that handles comments from multiple editors, various document locations, and different comment types through a single standardized system. This multi-functional interface provides consistent navigation, filtering, and review capabilities regardless of the comment's origin or location, simplifying the management of diverse feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If all comments are displayed in the user interface to ensure complete review, then the thoroughness of comment review is improved, but the usability and readability of the interface deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereview thoroughnessVSAvoidinterface usability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic comment display interface that can adapt between showing all comments and showing only relevant comments based on user context and selections. The interface dynamically filters, sorts, and prioritizes comments based on their relevance to the currently viewed document portion, allowing users to maintain thorough review capability while preserving interface usability through adaptive display options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9965475B2User interface for navigating comments associated with collaboratively edited electronic documents
Publication Date: 2018.05.08 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US9965475B2 patent drawing
  • US9965475B2 patent drawing
  • US9965475B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An end user application running on a local client computer is configured to store a collection of comment data for the electronic document. The comment data includes data representing a plurality of comment threads. Displays of comment data also include hints providing information about the content and context of previous and next comments outside of the currently viewed context of the document. When hints are used in combination with filtering of the comment data, a user can more quickly review comments based on a variety of filtering criteria. A comment map also can be provided as a spatial representation of the distribution of comments within a document. Such a comment map can be provided as a navigational aid for viewing the electronic document and reviewing comments. The comment map provides an additional way for a reviewer to quickly identify areas of a document which may require more review.