Network Commerce Collection Entry Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current network-based commerce systems lack efficient methods for generating, editing, and accessing catalog content, particularly in managing collectible items, which includes tracking provenance and handling duplicate or unauthorized entries, and ensuring accurate classification and editing permissions.

Innovation Solution

A network-based commerce system with modules for collection entry creation, editing, and classification, including rollback functionality, administrative functions for dispute resolution, and user permission management, utilizes a classification module to parse textual descriptions into structured data and stores this information in databases, allowing users to create, edit, and browse collections and entries while enforcing editing privileges and tracking provenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If users are allowed to edit collection entries freely, then ease of operation is improved, but data integrity and reliability deteriorate due to vandalism and unauthorized modifications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of editingVSAvoiddata integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements differential permission settings where different user roles (owners, editors, viewers) have different editing capabilities on collection entries. Owners have full edit rights, editors have limited rights, and viewers have none. This local quality approach allows free editing where authorized while protecting data integrity where unauthorized access is blocked.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback mechanisms including approval workflows where edit submissions are reviewed before publication, and version history that tracks all modifications. This feedback loop allows users to edit freely while maintaining reliability through review and version control processes that can revert unauthorized or erroneous changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If comprehensive permission management is implemented, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The permission management system is segmented into discrete roles (owner, editor, viewer) with clearly defined permissions for each. This segmentation simplifies the complexity by providing a structured framework where users are assigned specific roles rather than managing individual permissions for each action, making the system more manageable while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The permission system is designed as a universal framework that can be applied across different collection types and user scenarios. The same role-based permission structure handles various operations (editing, deleting, approving) uniformly, reducing overall system complexity through standardized multi-functional permission handling rather than separate mechanisms for each operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If duplicate entries are prevented through strict validation, then manufacturing precision is improved, but ease of operation worsens due to restricted user input

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidease of entry
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically generating unique identifiers and preliminary validation checks before user submission. This preliminary processing ensures data accuracy by preventing duplicates at the system level while maintaining ease of operation by handling the complex validation logic transparently without burdening the user interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service duplicate detection where incoming entries are automatically compared against existing collections using algorithms that match based on key attributes. This self-service approach maintains data accuracy through automatic duplicate prevention while preserving ease of operation by eliminating manual duplicate checking requirements for users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10229445B2System and method for managing shared collections
Publication Date: 2019.03.12 EBAY INC
  • US10229445B2 patent drawing
  • US10229445B2 patent drawing
  • US10229445B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for managing structured descriptions of entries are described. For example, a machine receives a textual description of an entry representing an item. The textual description represents the item being submitted by a user, and received from a client device associated with the user by a network-based system. The entry, after creation, corresponds to a listing of the item at the network-based system. The machine generates a structured description of the entry based on the textual description of the entry. The structured description includes a name-value pair derived from the textual description submitted by the user. The machine receives an edited version of the structured description based on causing a display of the structured description in a user interface of the client device. The machine stores the edited version of the structured description in a record of a database.