Commerce Network Quote Evaluation System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current commerce networks face inefficiencies in evaluating and selecting quotes, leading to sub-optimal user experiences, manual processes, and difficulties in finding new suppliers, resulting in delayed procurement and lack of visibility in quotes, which can impact business continuity and lead to unfavorable pricing.

Innovation Solution

A commerce network system that electronically evaluates and selects quotes by applying a weighted combination of evaluating factors, including price, quality of service, and delivery time, using a matching engine to identify suitable suppliers and facilitate automated or manual awarding based on business rules, thereby enhancing the user experience and improving quote quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual quote evaluation processes are used, then buyers can review quotes in detail, but the process is time-consuming and reduces productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequote evaluation accuracyVSAvoidquote processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical evaluation processes with an automated electronic system that uses algorithms and computing power to evaluate quotes. The system automatically receives, evaluates, and ranks quotes from multiple suppliers based on predefined criteria, eliminating the need for manual review while maintaining evaluation accuracy through systematic computational methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables automated self-evaluation of quotes through predefined business rules and evaluation criteria. The commerce network automatically performs the evaluation work without requiring continuous human intervention, allowing the system to serve itself in processing and ranking quotes based on established parameters such as price, delivery time, and quality metrics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If automated quote evaluation is implemented, then processing speed increases, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequote processing speedVSAvoidevaluation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation system is segmented into distinct functional modules: quote reception module, evaluation criteria module, scoring module, and ranking module. Each module handles a specific aspect of the evaluation process, making the overall complex system manageable through functional decomposition. This modular approach allows the system to process quotes automatically while keeping the complexity organized and controllable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation system is designed to handle multiple evaluation criteria (price, delivery time, quality, service level) within a single unified platform. The system can evaluate different types of quotes from various suppliers using the same infrastructure, making it a multi-functional solution that reduces overall system complexity compared to having separate systems for each evaluation aspect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If multiple evaluating factors are considered, then quote selection quality improves, but the evaluation process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequote selection qualityVSAvoidevaluation criteria complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system manages multiple evaluation factors by converting them into standardized numerical parameters with assigned weights. Each qualitative factor (quality, service level) is transformed into a quantifiable parameter that can be mathematically processed. This parameter transformation allows the system to consider multiple factors simultaneously while maintaining evaluation simplicity through standardized scoring mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces weighted scoring as an intermediary mechanism that simplifies the comparison of multiple evaluation factors. By assigning weights to different criteria and calculating composite scores, the system creates an intermediate representation that bridges the gap between multiple complex factors and a single ranked outcome, making the evaluation process more manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If buyers manually search for suppliers, then they can find suitable suppliers, but the process is time-consuming and delays procurement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupplier selection capabilityVSAvoidprocurement cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-registering and pre-vetting suppliers in the commerce network before actual procurement needs arise. Suppliers are evaluated and stored in a ready-to-use database with their capabilities, qualifications, and performance metrics pre-assessed. When a procurement need arises, the system can immediately query and match suppliers without requiring time-consuming searches or initial vetting processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual supplier search and selection processes with automated electronic matching systems. The system uses algorithms to automatically match buyer requirements with supplier capabilities based on predefined criteria, eliminating the need for manual supplier research, contact, and evaluation while maintaining adaptability through configurable matching parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS9836773B2Evaluation and selection of quotes of a commerce network
Publication Date: 2017.12.05 ARIBA INC
  • US9836773B2 patent drawing
  • US9836773B2 patent drawing
  • US9836773B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments for methods, systems and apparatuses of a commerce network for completing a commercial transaction are disclosed. One computer-method includes receiving, by one or more commerce network servers, a buyer-initiated demand for fulfillment of the commercial transaction, identifying suppliers to satisfy the buyer-initiated demand based on buyer policies and supplier characteristics, requesting quotes from the identified suppliers, receiving quotes from the identified suppliers, evaluating and selecting, by the one or more commerce network servers, one or more of the received quotes, wherein evaluating and selecting the one or more of the received quote comprises applying evaluating criteria to the received quotes, wherein the evaluation criteria includes applying a weighted combination of a plurality of evaluating factors, and facilitating presentation of the one or more selected quotes to the buyer.