Common Rail Fuel Pump Control via Segmented Metering Valves

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Common rail fuel pumps face inefficiencies due to high-pressure fuel leakages and uneven distribution of pumping duty among pump elements, leading to reduced efficiency and potential fatigue failure, and there is a need for accurate control of rail pressure to maintain injection pressure.

Innovation Solution

A control method for a fuel pump assembly with multiple pump elements, where each element has a dedicated metering valve and is driven by a cam with multiple lobes, uses a PI controller to adjust the control valve based on measured and demanded rail pressure, incorporating proportional and integral terms to maintain rail pressure and diagnose faults by comparing integral terms across cam lobes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single inlet metering valve is used to meter fuel entering all pump elements, then the pumping duty is distributed equally among pump elements, but the frequency of pumping strokes for each element is maximum leading to potential fatigue failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepump element reliabilityVSAvoidpumping duty distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single inlet metering valve into multiple separate metering valves, with each pump element having its own dedicated metering valve. This segmentation allows independent control of each pump element's pumping duty, enabling reduced frequency of pumping strokes for specific elements to prevent fatigue failure while maintaining overall system productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If each pump element is provided with its own dedicated metering valve, then the pumping duty can be independently controlled, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepumping duty control flexibilityVSAvoidmetering valve configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the fuel metering function into separate valves for each pump element, enabling independent control of pumping duty for each element. This allows flexible adaptation to varying operational requirements while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each dedicated metering valve serves multiple functions: it controls fuel metering for its associated pump element, enables independent pumping duty adjustment, and facilitates fault isolation. This multi-functionality justifies the increased complexity by providing versatile control capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If pump elements operate with clearances between components, then assembly is simplified, but high-pressure fuel leakages occur during pumping stroke reducing pump efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly simplicityVSAvoidfuel leakage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by monitoring rail pressure and using this information to adjust the metering valve timing and duration. This feedback mechanism compensates for fuel leakages through clearance gaps, maintaining pump efficiency without requiring tighter tolerances or more complex sealing arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes operational parameters (metering valve timing, duration, and pumping frequency) based on detected conditions to compensate for fuel leakages. By adjusting these parameters in response to pressure deviations, the system maintains efficiency despite the presence of clearance-based leakages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If rail pressure is not controlled accurately, then the control system is simpler, but injection pressure cannot be maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinjection pressure stabilityVSAvoidpressure control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs feedback control where rail pressure is continuously monitored and used to adjust metering valve operation. This closed-loop system maintains accurate rail pressure and injection pressure stability, justifying the added complexity through improved reliability and control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2295775B1Control method for a common rail fuel pump and apparatus for performing the same
Publication Date: 2019.09.04 DELPHI TECH IP LTD
  • EP2295775B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2295775B1 patent drawingFigure 2(a)~2
  • EP2295775B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method and apparatus for controlling a fuel pump assembly comprising a plurality of pump elements (10) for delivering fuel at high pressure to a rail volume, each of the pump elements (10) comprising a plunger (12) which is driven by an associated cam to perform at least one pumping event per engine revolution and a control valve (20) for controlling fuel flow into and/or out of the pump chamber (14). Each pumping event corresponds to an associated cam lobe of the associated cam. The method comprises, for each pumping event of each pump element, controlling the control valve (20) of said pump element (10) in response to an output control signal (52a-52f, 114) derived from at least one previous pumping event. The output control signal (52a-52f, 114) is derived by measuring fuel pressure within the rail volume to derive a measured rail pressure value (42); and comparing the measured rail pressure value (42) with a demanded rail pressure value (46) to derive a rail pressure error (102). A proportional and integral calculation is performed on the rail pressure error (102) to derive a proportional term (104) for the rail pressure error (102) and an integral term (110) for the rail pressure error (102). The proportional term (104) and the integral term (110) are combined to derive the output control signal (52a-52f, 114). Monitoring of the integral term (110) for each pumping event of each pump element provides a means for identifying and diagnosing a fault condition within the fuel pump assembly or associated fuel system.