Common Rail Return Pipe Layout for Pressure Reducing Valve Lubrication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing engine devices with common rails face restrictions in mounting angle and direction of the fuel return pipe, leading to potential abrasion of the pressure reducing valve and limited design freedom due to the need for additional supporting members and protection of fuel injection pipes.

Innovation Solution

The common rail is arranged below the air-intake manifold, with the fuel return pipe extending from the pressure reducing valve to a higher position and then to a lower position, allowing the pressure reducing valve to be soaked in fuel and eliminating the need for additional support members, while the fuel injection pipes pass between the cylinder head and exhaust gas recirculation device for protection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the common rail is mounted at a restricted mounting angle (45 to 90 degrees upward) to ensure fuel lubrication of the pressure reducing valve, then the sliding part of the pressure reducing valve is properly soaked in fuel, but the design freedom and mounting flexibility of the engine device are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel lubrication of pressure reducing valveVSAvoidmounting angle flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel return pipe is configured to extend in multiple directions and positions, specifically extending from the pressure reducing valve to a position higher than the pressure reducing valve and then to a position lower than the pressure reducing valve. This three-dimensional routing allows fuel to reach the sliding part from above through gravity and pressure, enabling proper lubrication regardless of the common rail's mounting angle or orientation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the parameter of fuel delivery path from a direct horizontal connection to a vertical multi-stage extension. By making the fuel return pipe extend upward first and then downward, the system ensures that fuel can flow to the sliding part through both pressure and gravity assistance, maintaining effective lubrication across varying mounting conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If additional supporting members are added to protect fuel injection pipes from damage, then the reliability of the engine device is improved, but the device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection of fuel injection pipesVSAvoidnumber of supporting members
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel return pipe is routed to pass between the cylinder head and the exhaust gas recirculation device. By utilizing the existing spatial relationship and structural components already present in the engine device, the fuel injection pipes are naturally protected without requiring additional supporting members. The exhaust gas recirculation device itself serves as a protective barrier.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The exhaust gas recirculation device serves a dual function: it performs its primary function of recirculating exhaust gas while simultaneously serving as a protective structure for the fuel injection pipes. This eliminates the need for dedicated protective components, reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This arrangement reduces abnormal abrasion of the pressure reducing valve, enhances design freedom, minimizes manufacturing costs, and protects the fuel injection pipes from damage, resulting in a more compact and reliable engine device.

Implementation Method 1

the fuel return pipe extends from the pressure reducing valve to a position higher than the pressure reducing valve, and then extends to a position lower than the pressure reducing valve. With this, the fuel can be stored between the pressure reducing valve and a portion of the fuel return pipe, which portion positioned higher than the pressure reducing valve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS20260036107A1Engine device
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 YANMAR POWER TECH CO LTD
  • US20260036107A1 patent drawing
  • US20260036107A1 patent drawing
  • US20260036107A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An engine device including a common rail configured to store, at a high pressure, a fuel supplied by a fuel feed pump. The common rail includes a pressure reducing valve configured to discharge the fuel in the common rail to a fuel return pipe. The fuel return pipe extends from the pressure reducing valve, and then extends to a position lower than the pressure reducing valve.