Communication Link Monitoring With Remaining Runtime Check

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing communication protocols in safety-relevant systems fail to minimize the maximum reaction time in the event of an error, leading to inefficient response times and larger safety margins, which can be reduced by calculating a remaining runtime and checking if it is less than the cycle time to trigger a monitoring signal.

Innovation Solution

A method that calculates a remaining runtime from the difference between a monitoring time and a timer, checking if it is less than or equal to the cycle time, and generates a monitoring signal to switch from process values to substitute values when the remaining runtime is less than the cycle time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the system waits for the watchdog time to expire before reacting to an error, then the monitoring is simple and reliable, but the maximum reaction time in case of error is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection reliabilityVSAvoidmaximum reaction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs a preliminary check by comparing the remaining watchdog time with the cycle time before the actual error reaction occurs. This advance comparison enables the system to prepare for and execute the error response more quickly, reducing the maximum reaction time while maintaining reliable error detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its monitoring approach by continuously evaluating the relationship between remaining watchdog time and cycle time. This dynamic evaluation allows the system to optimize its response timing based on current operational conditions, thereby reducing the maximum reaction time without compromising reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If larger safety margins are implemented to account for worst-case error scenarios, then system reliability is improved, but system scalability is reduced and safety distances must be larger

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety marginVSAvoidsystem scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the temporal parameters of error monitoring by introducing the remaining watchdog time comparison mechanism. This parameter change enables more precise timing control, allowing the system to maintain adequate safety margins while reducing the conservative overestimation that limits scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4524661B1Method for monitoring a communication connection
Publication Date: 2026.02.04 SIEMENS AG
  • EP4524661B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4524661B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP4524661B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for monitoring a communication link between a first participant (1) and a second participant (2), wherein a first processing program (P1) with a first cycle time (ZT1) is executed cyclically in the first participant (1), a first diagnostic unit (D1) with a first timer (Z1) is operated in the first participant (1) to monitor the communication link such that the arrival of a first telegram (T1) from the second participant (2) starts the first timer (Z1), wherein within a predefinable first monitoring time (WD_T1), the arrival of a second telegram (T2) from the second participant (2) is monitored using the first timer (Z1), and wherein a remaining runtime (RLZ) is calculated in the first diagnostic unit (D1) from the difference between the first monitoring time (WD_T1) and the first timer (Z1) and is checked.a monitoring signal (TO) is generated if the remaining runtime (RLZ) is less than or equal to the first cycle time (ZT1).