Community-Sourced Education Platform With Peer Comparison And Credibility Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Computer-based and internet-based education systems limit student interactions, reducing the efficacy of educational material by preventing discussions of common problems and answers, and lacking a competitive aspect due to the inability to compare performance with other students.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that registers users, presents educational material, records performance, compiles statistics, compares individual performance to community statistics, subdivides users into communities based on personal information, facilitates interactions, and generates credibility scores within communities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If computer-based education systems are used to allow students to complete coursework without being present in the classroom, then accessibility and flexibility are improved, but student interaction and competitive motivation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccessibilityVSAvoidstudent interaction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a community interaction module as an intermediary that mediates between individual students and the educational content. This module enables students to post questions, share answers, and engage in discussions about coursework without requiring physical presence in a classroom, thus preserving accessibility while restoring interaction capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions the educational system from a two-dimensional model (individual student vs. educational content) to a multi-dimensional model by adding the social interaction dimension. Students can now interact with peers, compare performance, and engage in competitive learning through the platform, while maintaining the original accessibility benefits of remote learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If computer-based education systems are used to allow students to complete coursework without being present in the classroom, then accessibility is improved, but student motivation and engagement deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccessibilityVSAvoidlearning effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements multiple feedback mechanisms including performance tracking that compares individual student progress with community averages, credibility scoring systems that provide social validation, and interactive discussion forums that give immediate feedback on student questions and contributions. These feedback loops enhance motivation and learning effectiveness while preserving remote accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the educational experience by introducing social and competitive elements such as credibility scores, performance comparisons, and community rankings. These parameter changes transform the learning environment from a solitary activity to an engaging social process, improving productivity without compromising accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If individual student performance tracking is implemented, then personalized learning is improved, but lack of comparison with peers reduces competitive motivation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance trackingVSAvoidcompetitive motivation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses performance tracking data to generate comparative feedback that shows students how their progress compares with community averages and peer performance. This feedback mechanism maintains precise individual measurement while adding the competitive element of comparison, thereby motivating students to improve their standing relative to others.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the measurement parameters by not only tracking individual performance metrics but also introducing comparative parameters such as community averages, percentiles, and credibility scores. This transformation enables both personalized learning and competitive motivation to coexist by providing multiple dimensions for student assessment and comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8666302B2System and method for education including community-sourced data and community interactions
Publication Date: 2014.03.04 ACADIO INC
  • US8666302B2 patent drawing
  • US8666302B2 patent drawing
  • US8666302B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for education including community-sourced data and community interactions. The method can include registering a plurality of users in a database, presenting educational material to a user of the plurality of users, recording the performance of the user in regards to the educational material, collecting personal statistics regarding the performance of the user, compiling the personal statistics for the plurality of users to generate community statistics regarding the performance of the plurality of users, comparing the personal statistics of a user to the community statistics or to a subset thereof, collecting personal information from each user of the plurality of users, subdividing the plurality of users into a plurality of communities based on the personal information of each user, facilitating interactions between the users within a community of the plurality of communities, and generating a credibility score for each user within the community.