Community Moderated Information Feedback Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing online ecosystems face challenges in effectively integrating social networks and prediction markets, particularly in managing external information sources such as advertisements, which can disrupt community stability by introducing irrelevant or untrustworthy information, and in distinguishing quality information from noise.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a feedback mechanism that allows users to rate the relevance and importance of information sources, and using contextually matched indicators to present information opportunities, ensuring that relevant information is displayed at the right time and to the right audience, while filtering out irrelevant content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If external information sources (advertisements, sponsored content) are integrated into the online ecosystem, then information diversity and potential value are improved, but community stability and information quality deteriorate due to introduction of irrelevant or untrustworthy content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation diversityVSAvoidcommunity stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces community moderators as intermediary entities between external information sources and the community. These moderators review, filter, and approve information before it enters the ecosystem, acting as a buffer that allows diverse information to be considered while preventing harmful or irrelevant content from disrupting community stability. This mediator layer resolves the contradiction by enabling information diversity without directly exposing the community to unfiltered external sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where community members can report inappropriate or irrelevant information, and moderators can adjust their filtering criteria based on community response. This continuous feedback loop allows the system to adapt to maintaining information quality while preserving diversity, as the feedback provides data to refine the balance between accepting diverse information and maintaining community stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Quantity of substance

If all information sources are presented to users, then information availability is improved, but user decision-making quality deteriorates due to information overload and noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation availabilityVSAvoiddecision-making quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing different information presentations to different users based on their profiles, interests, and historical behavior. Rather than uniformly presenting all information to all users, the system tailors information delivery to individual contexts, ensuring that each user receives a curated subset of available information that is most relevant to their needs, thereby maintaining high decision-making quality while preserving overall information availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments information into categories and prioritizes presentations based on verified quality metrics, user preferences, and contextual relevance. By dividing the overwhelming totality of information into manageable, prioritized segments, users can efficiently process high-value information without being paralyzed by the full volume of available data, thus maintaining decision-making quality while preserving information availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If community moderation is implemented to filter information, then information quality is improved, but system complexity and operational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service moderation where community members empower themselves to identify and report low-quality information, and the system automatically applies filtering algorithms based on community-generated criteria. This distributes the moderation workload across the community rather than concentrating it in a centralized complex system, maintaining information quality while reducing overall system complexity through decentralized, automated processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary filtering of information sources based on pre-established community criteria and historical performance data before information reaches the main community feed. By pre-screening and pre-categorizing information sources, the system reduces the burden on real-time moderation processes, maintaining high information quality while simplifying the operational complexity of active moderation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10083420B2Community moderated information
Publication Date: 2018.09.25 SERMO
  • US10083420B2 patent drawing
  • US10083420B2 patent drawing
  • US10083420B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one aspect, an approach is provided that assists in presenting the right information within the ecosystem. The approach involves associating information sources (ads, sponsored information, research requests, debate notices, seminars, education opportunities, peer generated information, etc) with a feedback mechanism. In one embodiment, the feedback mechanism includes a scoring feature, where individual participants within the ecosystem rate the relevancy and/or importance of the information provided. In one example, a user is notified that a potentially relevant information source is available. The notification is typically displayed unobtrusively within a browser or interface window that the user is navigating. In one implementation, the user must perform some affirmative action to reach information associated with the information opportunity. In one example, requiring an affirmative action serves as a shield from pop-ups, banner-ads, and other distracting form of advertising. It is also realized that allowing the user to select the information opportunity rather than display it immediately permits the user to decide explore the opportunity. In one example, permitting the user to decide to explore the opportunity increases the user's receptivity to the information opportunity. In one embodiment, information associated with the information opportunity is displayed in response to user selection. The information associated with the information opportunity describes the information opportunity available. The user is provided with the opportunity to evaluate the information opportunity without being required to visit it and/or review it in its entirety. The information associated with the information opportunity may also be displayed with user feedback.