Community Energy Storage Control With EV Battery Aging Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing integration of renewable energy sources and electric vehicles in power grids creates uncertainty and volatility in energy supply, leading to unstable electricity prices and potential power outages, while existing V2G solutions neglect battery aging, resulting in inefficient energy management and premature battery degradation.

Innovation Solution

An edge computing device optimizes energy storage strategies for households by incorporating a battery aging model, allowing for bidirectional charging and discharging of electric vehicle batteries to balance supply and demand, while minimizing battery degradation and energy costs through smart charging and Vehicle-To-Everything (V2X) infrastructure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If V2G solutions are implemented to balance supply and demand, then energy management efficiency is improved, but battery degradation accelerates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy management efficiencyVSAvoidbattery life
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts charging/discharging parameters (rate, duration, timing) based on grid conditions and battery state to optimize the trade-off between energy management efficiency and battery degradation. The edge computing device modifies operational parameters in real-time to minimize harmful effects while maintaining productivity benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where battery state (charge level, temperature, degradation indicators) and grid conditions are monitored, and charging/discharging decisions are adjusted accordingly. This feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from past operations and optimize future decisions to balance efficiency and battery longevity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If centralized optimization is used for V2G solutions, then energy allocation is improved, but computation load increases and single point of failure risk arises

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy allocation efficiencyVSAvoidcomputation load
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the optimization problem into hierarchical levels: cloud computing handles high-level strategic optimization and data aggregation, while edge computing devices handle local tactical optimization. This segmentation distributes computation load, reduces central processing requirements, and eliminates single points of failure by enabling autonomous local decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The edge computing device acts as an intermediary between the cloud-based centralized system and local V2G operations. It receives optimization goals from the cloud, processes local data, and executes decisions autonomously when connected, or independently when disconnected, thereby reducing computation load on central systems while maintaining allocation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of energy

If battery charging is increased during low price periods, then energy cost is reduced, but battery aging accelerates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy costVSAvoidbattery aging
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts charging strategies based on real-time battery state and grid conditions rather than following static low-price-period schedules. When battery state indicates vulnerability to degradation (extreme temperatures, high charge levels), the system modifies or pauses charging even during low-price periods, creating a dynamic balance between cost reduction and battery protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary assessment of battery state before initiating charging during low-price periods. If conditions are favorable (moderate temperature, appropriate charge level), charging proceeds; if conditions indicate risk of accelerated aging, the system takes preliminary protective action by delaying or modifying charging, thereby preventing future degradation while still capturing cost savings when safe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4287086A1Energy storage optimization
Publication Date: 2023.12.06 POLESTAR PERFORMANCE
  • EP4287086A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4287086A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4287086A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The disclosure relates to a device (200) configured to optimize an energy storage strategy of a community (112) comprising a plurality of households (108). Further, the disclosure relates to a cloud computing device (300) configured to optimize an energy storage strategy of a community (112) comprising a plurality of households (108). Further, the disclosure relates to an electric vehicle (102) associated with a household (108) in a community (112) comprising a plurality of households (108), the electric vehicle comprising (102) a battery aging model indicative of a battery aging status of a battery pack of said electric vehicle (102). Further, the disclosure relates to methods (400, 500) directed to optimize energy storage of households and communities.