Community Summary Platform with Dynamic Ranking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current socially authored content platforms, such as community-driven encyclopedias, face limitations in providing comprehensive coverage of rapidly advancing fields due to their inability to generate and display multiple summaries of documents, lack of links to recent publications, and limited user interaction features, which restrict their utility and scope.

Innovation Solution

A system and technique for generating and displaying summaries of documents, allowing users to create, modify, and rank summaries, with automatic generation using analytic techniques, and incorporating links to relevant content, enabling users to navigate and prioritize summaries based on user feedback and relevance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If multiple summaries of the same document are allowed, then information completeness and user choice are improved, but system complexity and management difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the summary creation process by allowing multiple independent summaries for each document, where each summary can be authored, ranked, and managed separately. This segmentation enables diverse perspectives and information completeness while maintaining manageable individual units that can be independently processed and displayed based on user preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic summary management through user ranking systems where the display order and visibility of multiple summaries change based on user feedback. This dynamic approach allows the system to adapt to user preferences automatically, reducing the need for manual curation while maintaining information completeness through multiple viewpoints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If automatic summary generation using analytic techniques is implemented, then productivity and coverage are improved, but manufacturing precision and quality control become more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesummary generation speedVSAvoidsummary quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates user feedback mechanisms where users can rank and evaluate automatically generated summaries. This feedback loop allows the system to learn from user preferences and continuously improve the quality and relevance of generated summaries, bridging the gap between high-speed automatic generation and consistent quality output through iterative refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal summary generation system that handles both automatically generated summaries and user-authored summaries through the same platform and evaluation mechanisms. This multi-functionality allows the system to leverage user feedback to improve automatic generation quality while maintaining high productivity, as the same feedback infrastructure serves both summary types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If user feedback and ranking systems are added, then ease of operation and user engagement are improved, but device complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction capabilityVSAvoidfeedback processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service summary curation where users directly interact with and rank summaries based on their own preferences and needs. This self-service approach eliminates the need for complex manual curation systems, as users themselves perform the selection and ranking tasks, thereby improving ease of operation while keeping the system's processing requirements relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses straightforward feedback mechanisms where users provide simple rankings rather than complex evaluations. This simplified feedback approach improves ease of operation by making user interaction intuitive while reducing the complexity of data processing, as the system only needs to aggregate and respond to simple ranking data rather than analyzing complex user preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Loss of information

If links to recent publications and related content are incorporated, then information accessibility and relevance are improved, but device complexity and navigation complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation accessibilityVSAvoidnavigation structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-organizes links to recent publications and related content within the summary structure itself, so that relevant information is already positioned and ready for user access. This preliminary organization reduces navigation complexity by eliminating the need for users to search for related content, as it is proactively provided in contextually appropriate locations within the summary display.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9262483B2Community authoring content generation and navigation
Publication Date: 2016.02.16 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US9262483B2 patent drawing
  • US9262483B2 patent drawing
  • US9262483B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more techniques and/or systems are provided for creating socially authored, or community authored, summaries of documents and/or for navigating a forum comprising such summaries. In one embodiment, at least some of the summaries are generated automatically when a document is written and/or discovered (e.g., by a web crawler), for example. In another embodiment, the documents are created by users of the forum. A plurality of summaries of a document may be created (e.g., by different users), and users can provide feedback, such as comments or ratings, that may assist other users in identifying which summary or summaries better describe the document. Moreover, the users can navigate the forum and retrieve summaries by browsing categories (and subcategories) to identify a topic of interest and/or by performing a search based upon user inputted search term(s).