Mechanical Commutator Motor Control for Brush Sparking Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mechanical commutators in electric motors experience brush wear due to spark erosion, noise, and electromagnetic emissions, which are not effectively addressed by existing control methods.

Innovation Solution

A method controlling an electric motor with a mechanical commutator using a pulse-modulated supply voltage signal, where the modulation signal is in phase with commutation times to reduce the supply voltage to essentially zero volts, minimizing spark formation and brush wear, employing techniques like pulse width modulation, pulse density modulation, or other modulation methods without or with the aid of sensors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a mechanical commutator with brushes is used in an electric motor, then cost-effective motor construction is achieved, but brush wear due to spark erosion occurs and noise and electromagnetic emissions are generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor construction costVSAvoidbrush service life
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The supply voltage is periodically reduced to essentially zero volts at commutation times using pulse width modulation, creating a periodic on-off action that suppresses sparks only when needed during commutation events while maintaining normal operation between commutations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The supply voltage parameter is dynamically changed by modulating it to essentially zero volts at commutation times, transforming the voltage from a continuous value to a time-varying parameter that adapts to the commutation state to minimize erosion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If a mechanical commutator with brushes is used in an electric motor, then cost-effective motor construction is achieved, but noise and electromagnetic emissions are generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor construction costVSAvoidnoise and electromagnetic emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The supply voltage is periodically suppressed at commutation times using pulse width modulation, creating intermittent voltage reduction that targets spark generation events specifically, thereby reducing noise and electromagnetic emissions only when mechanical commutation occurs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The supply voltage parameter is dynamically modulated to essentially zero volts synchronized with commutation times, changing the electrical parameter to minimize arc formation and its associated noise and electromagnetic interference

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the supply voltage is reduced to essentially zero volts at commutation times, then brush wear and sparking are reduced, but the average supply voltage must be maintained for motor operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrush service lifeVSAvoidaverage supply voltage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The voltage suppression is applied periodically only during brief commutation intervals rather than continuously, allowing the average voltage to remain sufficient for motor operation while providing protective voltage reduction exactly when sparks occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The voltage is reduced to essentially zero volts (excessive reduction) but only for brief periods during commutation, not continuously, so that the partial time-averaged voltage remains adequate for normal motor power requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces brush wear, noise, and electromagnetic interference, enabling the use of cost-effective electric motors with mechanical commutators in applications previously requiring brushless motors.

Implementation Method 1

the supply voltage signal is modulated to reduce its size at the commutation times by means of a modulation signal which is in phase with the commutation times

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPulse width modulation: Phase Modulation

Data Source

PatentEP4042561B1Method for controlling an electric motor having a mechanical commutator
Publication Date: 2024.11.06 ELMOS SEMICONDUCTOR SE DE
  • EP4042561B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4042561B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2e
  • EP4042561B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for controlling an electric motor (10) having a mechanical commutator (12), wherein in the method the points in time at which a commutation occurs are determined by means of a sensor (36) or without a sensor. Furthermore, the electric motor (10) is controlled by means of a supply voltage signal (16) comprising a sequence of pulses. Finally, the supply voltage signal (16) is modulated by means of a modulation signal (28) in order to reduce the size thereof at the commutation times (24).