Coordinated Multipoint Interference Mitigation via X2 Interface

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Coordinated multipoint (CoMP) schemes in wireless networks face limitations due to the lack of standardization in proprietary interfaces between remote radio heads (RRHs) and base stations, restricting interference mitigation and throughput enhancement across different vendor networks, especially for user equipment at the edge of base station coverage areas.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method where interference reports from one base station to another are used to adjust beamforming and transmission power settings for subframes, allowing for coordinated multipoint transmission to mitigate interference, using backhaul communication links and standardized interfaces like X2 communication channels to coordinate between base stations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If proprietary interfaces are used between RRHs and base stations, then implementation flexibility is maintained, but interoperability and interference mitigation across different vendor networks deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation flexibilityVSAvoidinterference mitigation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by implementing a standardized X2 communication interface that enables multiple base stations from different vendors to interoperate. This standardized interface allows the system to achieve both implementation flexibility and reliable interference mitigation by providing a universal communication protocol that works across different vendor networks, eliminating the limitation of proprietary interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If coordinated multipoint transmission is implemented, then interference mitigation and throughput enhancement are improved, but system complexity and standardization requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethroughput performanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the intermediary principle by introducing a standardized X2 communication interface as a mediator between base stations. This intermediary layer simplifies the coordination complexity by providing predefined communication protocols and message formats, allowing coordinated multipoint transmission to be implemented without excessive system complexity. The standardized interface acts as a mediator that handles the complex coordination tasks automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If base stations coordinate downlink transmissions, then spectral efficiency is improved, but communication overhead and signaling complexity worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidcommunication overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting transmission parameters such as beamforming vectors, power allocation, and resource block assignment based on channel conditions and interference measurements. The standardized X2 interface enables efficient exchange of these parameter information between base stations, allowing coordinated downlink transmissions to improve spectral efficiency while minimizing communication overhead through optimized parameter updating strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8862176B2Techniques for mitigating interference associated with downlink transmissions from a base station
Publication Date: 2014.10.14 APPLE INC
  • US8862176B2 patent drawing
  • US8862176B2 patent drawing
  • US8862176B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples are disclosed for causing one or more subframes to be transmitted from a base station for a wireless network based on beamforming or transmission power characteristics. In some examples, an interference report may be received at a base station via a backhaul communication link. The interference report may indicate measured interference from the base station as measured at one or more wireless devices. The base station may transmit subsequent subframes in a manner to mitigate the previously reported interference. Other examples are described and claimed.