CoMP Scheduling via Iterative Weighted Rate Optimization
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing Coordinated Multi-Point (CoMP) scheduling methods for LTE heterogeneous wireless networks face challenges due to the lack of practical methods for obtaining channel state information feedback and assuming ideal conditions, leading to inefficient resource allocation and implementation issues.
Innovation Solution
A method for CoMP scheduling that determines constraints, receives channel state information feedback, and iteratively calculates weighted user rates based on user weights and buffer sizes, using a processor to manage resource allocation across multiple transmission points in HetNets, with two approaches (Class-A and Class-B) for obtaining CSI feedback, ensuring standards compliance and robustness against errors.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If prior CoMP scheduling methods assume ideal conditions with perfect channel state information, then scheduling accuracy is improved, but implementation feasibility deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements a feedback mechanism where user equipment devices transmit channel state information to transmission points. This allows the system to use actual measured channel conditions rather than assuming perfect information, bridging the gap between theoretical optimality and practical implementability.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent transforms the channel state information from idealized perfect knowledge to practical measured values with quantization. By changing the parameter representation from theoretical to measured, the system achieves implementation feasibility while maintaining sufficient scheduling accuracy.
2Ease of manufacture
If practical methods for obtaining channel state feedback are implemented, then implementation feasibility is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements partial channel state information feedback by selecting and transmitting only the most relevant channel parameters. This partial action approach maintains implementation feasibility while preserving sufficient precision for effective scheduling decisions.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent uses quantized and simplified channel state information representations that are easier to measure and transmit. These simplified representations, while not perfectly precise, provide sufficient accuracy for practical scheduling implementation.
3Productivity
If iterative determination of weighted sum of user rates is performed with constraints, then resource allocation efficiency is improved, but computational complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the resource allocation problem into iterative steps, where each iteration focuses on determining the weighted sum of user rates based on current channel conditions and constraints. This segmentation allows complex optimization to be broken into manageable computational tasks.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements dynamic iterative optimization where the weighted sum calculation adapts to changing channel conditions and user constraints. The iterative process dynamically adjusts resource allocation decisions based on current system state, improving efficiency while managing computational load through incremental updates.
Data Source
AI summary
A method and transmitting device are provided for coordinated multi-point transmission scheduling by a transmitting device over one or more heterogeneous wireless networks that include a set of clusters. Each of the clusters has a set of transmission points for serving a set of user equipment devices. The method includes determining constraints imposed on any of the user equipment devices. The method further includes receiving channel state information feedback from the user equipment devices. The method also includes obtaining user weights and buffer sizes. The method additionally includes iteratively determining a weighted sum of user rates based on the constraints, the channel state information feedback, the user weights, and the buffer sizes. The iteratively determining step determines the weighted sum of user rates based on an initial weighted sum of user rates determined for the user equipment devices without the constraints.


