Compact CT-PET Imaging for Ex-Vivo Tissue Resection Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing imaging devices combining CT and PET modules are bulky, complex, and difficult to operate intraoperatively for assessing resection accuracy of ex-vivo tissue specimens, often requiring lesion markers and lacking sufficient spatial resolution for small specimens.

Innovation Solution

A compact, modular imaging apparatus with a PET module above a CT module, featuring a motion system for vertical specimen movement and high-resolution detectors, allowing intraoperative evaluation with reduced radiation exposure and rapid image reconstruction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If CT and PET imaging modules are combined to improve imaging accuracy, then the device becomes bulky and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging accuracyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a horizontal arrangement of CT and PET modules to a vertical stacking configuration. The CT table moves vertically to bring the specimen into the PET detection ring, utilizing the vertical dimension to resolve the spatial conflict between two imaging modalities. This dimensional change allows both modules to coexist in a compact footprint while maintaining their imaging functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent embeds the PET detection ring within the vertical space above the CT table, creating a nested configuration where the PET module is positioned within the vertical envelope of the CT module. This nesting allows the PET detectors to surround the specimen from above while the CT scanners operate below, maximizing space utilization and reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Measurement precision

If CT and PET imaging modules are combined to improve imaging accuracy, then the device becomes voluminous and difficult to place in operating room

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging accuracyVSAvoiddevice volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes vertical stacking to reduce the horizontal footprint of the combined imaging system. By arranging CT and PET modules in the vertical dimension rather than horizontally, the overall device volume occupying operating room space is significantly reduced, making it feasible for intraoperative use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a dynamically movable CT table that can vertically translate to position specimens within the PET detection ring. This dynamic positioning mechanism allows the system to adapt its configuration during operation, enabling compact spatial arrangement while maintaining imaging capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If conventional CT and PET devices are used to image small specimens, then spatial resolution is insufficient for accurate tumor visualization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial resolutionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dedicated high-resolution micro-CT and small-animal PET detectors specifically optimized for small specimen imaging. These specialized detectors provide enhanced spatial resolution and sensitivity for small specimens, with local quality tailored to the specific imaging requirements rather than general-purpose imaging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the imaging system into specialized modular components: high-resolution CT detectors for morphological detail and PET detectors for functional information. Each module is independently optimized for its specific detection function, allowing high spatial resolution imaging of small specimens while maintaining system modularity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate, rapid intraoperative assessment of resection margins with high spatial resolution and reduced device complexity, facilitating efficient use in operating rooms.

Implementation Method 1

a positron emission tomography (PET) imaging module including at least one pair of PET detectors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPositron emission: Radioactive Decay

Implementation Method 2

PET imaging module can detect the distribution of a positron-emitting radiotracer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGamma ray detection: Radiation

Implementation Method 3

a computed tomography (CT) imaging module including an X-ray source and an X-ray detector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray transmission: X-Ray

Implementation Method 4

CT imaging module can for example detect differences in tissue densities in a tissue specimen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTissue density detection: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentUS12402846B2Imaging apparatus for imaging ex-vivo tissue specimens
Publication Date: 2025.09.02 XEOS MEDICAL NV
  • US12402846B2 patent drawing
  • US12402846B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An imaging apparatus for imaging ex-vivo tissue specimens includes a positron emission tomography imaging module having at least one pair of PET detectors; a computed tomography imaging module including an X-ray source and an X-ray detector; a tissue specimen receiving element configured to receive the tissue specimen to be imaged.