Compact Loader Detachable Control for Operator-Aware Mode Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing compact loaders face challenges in efficiently transitioning between walk-behind and riding modes, particularly in managing operational parameters of traction and implement systems based on operator presence and attachment type, which can lead to inefficiencies and safety issues.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes a platform sensor to detect operator presence and proximity, coupled with a controller that adjusts operational settings of the traction and implement systems, and a detachable control for remote operation, allowing for precise control and safe use in various environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the operator uses a detachable control for remote operation, then safety is improved by maintaining distance from the vehicle, but control precision and responsiveness may deteriorate due to wireless communication delays and distance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator safetyVSAvoidcontrol precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical wired connection between controls and vehicle with a wireless communication system. The detachable control unit communicates with the vehicle controller through wireless signals, eliminating the need for physical connection while maintaining control functionality. This substitution enables remote operation for improved safety while preserving control precision through advanced wireless communication protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If the system automatically adjusts operational settings based on operator presence detection, then efficiency is improved by optimizing traction and implement settings, but system complexity increases due to additional sensors and control logic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by automatically detecting operator presence through platform sensors and autonomously adjusting operational settings without requiring manual intervention. The controller monitors sensor inputs and automatically optimizes traction and implement settings based on whether the operator is on the platform or using remote control, enabling the system to adapt to operating conditions independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where platform sensors continuously monitor operator presence and provide signals to the controller. The controller processes this feedback information and automatically adjusts operational parameters accordingly. This closed-loop feedback system enables efficient automatic adaptation while managing complexity through integrated sensor-controller architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If the platform sensor detects operator presence to change operating settings, then adaptability is improved by switching between riding and walk-behind modes, but measurement reliability may deteriorate in environments with sensor interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemode switching capabilityVSAvoidsensor detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The platform sensor system is designed with multi-functionality to serve multiple detection purposes. It not only detects operator presence for mode switching but also integrates with the wireless control system to determine whether to enable remote operation features. This universal detection capability improves adaptability while enhancing reliability through versatile sensor utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its operational mode based on real-time sensor detection. When the platform sensor detects operator presence, the system transitions to riding mode with appropriate settings; when the operator is absent or using detachable controls, it switches to walk-behind or remote operation mode. This dynamic adaptation enhances versatility while maintaining reliability through conditional logic that accounts for various operating environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250333932A1Work vehicle with detachable control that changes operation based on signal from platform sensor
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 THE TORO COMPANY
  • US20250333932A1 patent drawing
  • US20250333932A1 patent drawing
  • US20250333932A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A ridable work vehicle includes an electric traction drive and an arm drive unit that is operable to move a loader arm assembly. The loader arm assembly includes a mechanical interface operable to mount a work attachment. The work vehicle includes a detachable operator control operable to wirelessly communicate with a controller of the work vehicle. One or both of the controller and the detachable operator control is operable to measure a proximity distance between the work vehicle and the detachable operator control. A platform sensor is operable to provide a platform signal in response to detecting an operator on the platform. The controller is operable to: determine a disposition of the operator relative to the work vehicle based on the proximity distance and the platform signal; and change an operating setting of the work vehicle based on a change in the disposition of the operator.