Compact Motion Simulator With Three Tilting Feet

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current motion simulators are bulky, complex, and limited in motion generation, making them unsuitable for small spaces and unable to simulate comprehensive vehicle movements effectively.

Innovation Solution

A compact motion simulator with a chair attached to a lower platform via three tilting feet with rolling linear guides, actuated by ball screws and servomotors, allowing for three-dimensional movement controlled by a computer program based on game or training telemetry data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If hexapod suspensions are used to enable motion in all six degrees of freedom, then motion capability is improved, but device complexity and size increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion capabilityVSAvoidsuspension complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motion simulator is divided into three independent tilting feet instead of using a complete hexapod suspension system. Each foot handles specific motion axes, segmenting the complexity while maintaining essential motion capabilities. This reduces the number of components and simplifies the overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts and removes unnecessary components from the traditional hexapod suspension system. By eliminating redundant structural elements and focusing only on the essential tilting motions needed for driving simulation, the design achieves motion capability with reduced complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Adaptability or versatility

If hexapod suspensions are used to provide comprehensive motion, then motion capability is improved, but the support surface area and entrance height increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion capabilityVSAvoidsupport surface area
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The base structure is segmented into three compact tilting feet rather than a large hexapod platform. This segmentation allows the motion function to be distributed across smaller, space-efficient components that occupy less floor area while maintaining the required motion degrees of freedom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention utilizes vertical tilting motion of the feet to achieve motion simulation without requiring large horizontal support surfaces. By transitioning from a horizontally-expanding hexapod structure to a vertically-oriented tilting mechanism, the design reduces the footprint area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If pneumatic hydraulic cylinders are used for actuation, then motion generation is simplified, but motion versatility is limited to lateral and forward/backward tilting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation complexityVSAvoidmotion generation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces pneumatic hydraulic cylinders with an electric actuation system using ball screws and servomotors. This substitution enables more versatile and precise motion control while maintaining actuation simplicity. The electric system can generate complex motion patterns including lateral, longitudinal, and diagonal tilting that hydraulic systems cannot achieve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The actuation system uses variable pitch ball screws with different lead angles to enable different types of tilting motion from the same linear actuator. By changing the mechanical parameters of the screw threads, the system can generate lateral tilting, longitudinal tilting, or diagonal motion, greatly expanding motion versatility without increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Area of stationary object

If a compact design is implemented to fit small spaces, then space utilization is improved, but motion generation capability may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace utilizationVSAvoidmotion simulation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The tilting feet are designed with dynamic adjustment capability through variable pitch ball screws, allowing the compact structure to generate diverse motion patterns. The dynamic reconfiguration of the screw pitch enables the same compact mechanism to produce different tilting motions, maintaining motion simulation capability while minimizing space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Each tilting foot is designed as a multi-functional component that can generate multiple types of motion (lateral, longitudinal, diagonal) through parameter changes in the ball screw mechanism. This universality allows a compact three-foot design to replace larger multi-component systems, achieving full motion simulation capability in a small footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides a cost-effective, versatile solution for simulating various vehicle movements in small spaces, offering realistic three-dimensional motion experiences for both gaming and training.

Implementation Method 1

each of said guides comprises an actuator element, preferably a ball screw, and an actuated element, preferably a rolling linear guide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBall screw mechanism: Screw

Implementation Method 2

each of which is in turn attached to a respective rolling linear guide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRolling friction: Roller

Implementation Method 3

A lower end of the foot has a second joint, preferably a ball joint, which is attached by means of securing to the rolling linear guide thereof

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBall joint: Ball

Data Source

PatentUS11308820B2Compact movement simulator
Publication Date: 2022.04.19 GONZALEZ MARTIN FRANCISCO JOSE
  • US11308820B2 patent drawing
  • US11308820B2 patent drawing
  • US11308820B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention pertains to the technical field of teaching or training simulators, more specifically the field of those especially designed for providing instruction on driving vehicles or other means of transport, and it particularly refers to a compact motion simulator for creating motion in three directions.