Compact PTM/PTP Protocol Stacks for Reliable Multicast Retransmission

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems face challenges in ensuring reliable multicast transmission and reception, particularly in NR systems, due to the need for efficient uplink feedback and retransmission mechanisms for MBS data packets.

Innovation Solution

A compact protocol stack is implemented at both the UE and base station levels, incorporating independent PTM and PTP logical channels for data reception and transmission, with feedback mechanisms to facilitate retransmissions based on reception status reports.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a compact protocol stack with independent PTM and PTP logical channels is implemented, then the reliability of multicast transmission is improved through feedback and retransmission mechanisms, but the device complexity increases due to the need to manage multiple logical channels and protocol entities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of multicast transmissionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The protocol stack is segmented into independent PTM and PTP logical channels with separate RLC entities, allowing independent management of multicast and unicast traffic flows. This segmentation enables reliable feedback and retransmission through PTP while maintaining efficient multicast delivery through PTM, resolving the contradiction between reliability and complexity by organizing the system into manageable independent components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The compact protocol stack design allows a single unified protocol structure to handle both PTM and PTP transmissions, providing multi-functionality. The same protocol entities manage both multicast and unicast traffic, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining reliability through integrated feedback mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If feedback reports from each subscriber UE are monitored through corresponding PTP RBs, then the reliability of multicast reception is improved, but the network signaling overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of multicast receptionVSAvoidnetwork signaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Feedback reports from different subscriber UEs are segmented and transmitted through corresponding dedicated PTP RBs rather than a single shared channel. This segmentation allows parallel feedback transmission, improving reliability by preventing feedback collisions while managing signaling overhead through efficient resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where UEs send reception status reports through PTP RBs, enabling the network to identify and retransmit missing packets. This feedback loop improves multicast reception reliability by allowing targeted retransmissions based on actual UE reception status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If mode switches between PTM and PTP are performed based on subscriber count thresholds, then the adaptability of the system is improved, but the control complexity increases due to threshold management and mode transition logic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to varying subscriber countsVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between PTM and PTP transmission modes based on real-time subscriber count thresholds. When subscriber count exceeds the upper threshold, the system transitions from PTM to PTP mode; when it falls below the lower threshold, it switches back to PTM mode. This dynamic adaptation optimizes resource utilization and reliability based on current network conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (transmission mode) based on subscriber count parameters. By monitoring subscriber count and comparing against predefined thresholds, the system adjusts its transmission strategy, switching between PTM and PTP modes to optimize performance for different network conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12382545B2Reliable multicast transmission with compact protocol stack
Publication Date: 2025.08.05 MEDIATEK SINGAPORE PTE LTD
  • US12382545B2 patent drawing
  • US12382545B2 patent drawing
  • US12382545B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and methods are provided for reliable multicast transmission with compact protocol stack. In one novel aspect, compact protocol stacks are configured for the UE and the base station handling both the PTM RB and the PTP RB. The compact protocol stack is either configured a compact RLC entity or a compact PDCP entity. The UE monitors a PTM LCH and a PTP LCH and sends feedback to the network with the PTP RB. The base station transmits MBS data packets in the PTM mode to the one or more subscriber UE, monitors feedback report from each subscriber UEs through corresponding PTP RB, and retransmits MBS data packets to one or more UEs through corresponding PTP RBs based on corresponding feedback reports. PTM-to-PTP and PTP-to-PTM mode switches are performed when triggering events are detected. The mode switch notification is sent to UEs via MAC CE or RLC control PDU.