Compact Particle Sensor with Direct Photodetection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing particle counters are costly due to expensive components like pumps, sealed chambers, and precise alignment requirements, making them unaffordable for applications like indoor air quality monitoring.

Innovation Solution

A particle sensor design with a larger flow passage than the light beam, eliminating the need for expensive light collection systems and precise alignment, using a low-cost axial fan and measuring flow via pulse width, and optionally incorporating a light baffle or lens for improved resolution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If expensive components like pumps, sealed chambers, and light collection systems are used, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes expensive components (pumps, sealed chambers, complex light collection systems) from the particle counter while maintaining particle detection capability. The open chamber design eliminates the need for sealed chambers and complex pumping systems, and the direct photodetector placement without complex optics reduces optical system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using complex light collection systems to gather scattered light, the patent inverts the approach by placing the photodetector directly in the path of scattered light without intermediate optical elements. This eliminates the need for lenses and mirrors typically required for light collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Measurement precision

If precise alignment of nozzle over beam is implemented, then measurement precision is improved, but ease of manufacture deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling accuracyVSAvoidalignment difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the nozzle component entirely from the design. Instead of requiring precise alignment of a nozzle over the light beam, the open chamber design allows particles to be drawn directly into the sensing volume through simple openings, eliminating alignment requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Measurement precision

If light collection techniques with lenses and mirrors are used, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight collection efficiencyVSAvoidoptical system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes lenses, mirrors, and other light collection components from the optical system. The photodetector is positioned to directly receive scattered light from particles in the sensing volume, eliminating the need for intermediate optical elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using complex optical systems to collect and focus scattered light, the patent places the photodetector directly in the scattered light path, inverting the traditional approach of using lenses and mirrors to gather light.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Measurement precision

If pressure sensors and mass flow sensors are added, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevolumetric flow measurement accuracyVSAvoidsensor assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes pressure sensors and mass flow sensors from the system. Flow rate is determined indirectly by measuring particle transit time through the light beam using the photodetector signal, eliminating the need for separate flow measurement devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design reduces costs by simplifying the sensor structure, allowing operation at low vacuum, using affordable materials, and maintaining accurate particle monitoring with improved size resolution.

Implementation Method 1

a beam of light which intersects a flow passage through the sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight: Light

Implementation Method 2

detecting the light scattered off the particles entrained in the air flow. These particles scatter light in proportion to their size, composition, shape and other physical properties

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight scattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 3

The photodetector converts this scattered light into an electrical signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentEP2145171B1Compact, low cost particle sensor
Publication Date: 2018.12.26 UNGER ROGER L
  • EP2145171B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2145171B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2145171B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A compact, low cost particle sensor utilizing a photodetector (31) which directly collects light scattered by particles (33) entrained in a fluid traversing a beam of light (32). The beam of light (32) is aligned such that it is in close proximity to the photo detector (31). The beam of light (32) is typically provided by a laser and associated focusing/collimating optics. The beam of light (32) intersects a portion of the fluid flow permitting a low pressure drop system and fluid flow generated by a low cost, low pressure device such as an axial fan (50).