Compact Power Planer Motor Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional power planers are bulky, heavy, and complex, making them difficult to operate and maintain, while block planes require manual force and frequent blade sharpening, leading to inefficiencies in finish carpentry tasks.

Innovation Solution

A compact power planer design with a motor assembly and depth adjustment system, featuring a housing with a cutting assembly and actuator, allowing for easy operation with one hand and minimizing blade replacement needs through a direct drive configuration and adjustable cutting depth.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If a traditional power planer is used, then cutting power is sufficient, but the device becomes bulky and heavy making it difficult to operate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting powerVSAvoiddevice weight
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The power planer is divided into separate functional modules: a motor assembly with motor housing containing the motor, and a planer assembly with planer housing containing the cutting blade and depth adjustment mechanism. These modules can be used separately or combined, allowing users to carry only the lightweight planer assembly for simple tasks while having access to the motor assembly when power is needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a single integrated power planer to a multi-dimensional system where the motor assembly and planer assembly can be independently positioned and combined. The motor assembly can be placed on the work surface to drive the planer blade, or the planer can be manually operated without the motor, creating flexible operational dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Extent of automation

If a traditional power planer is used, then automated cutting is achieved, but the design becomes complex making it difficult to produce and repair

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated cuttingVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated power cutting function is segmented into a separate motor assembly that can be independently produced, tested, and repaired. The planer assembly contains only the mechanical cutting components. This segmentation simplifies the design of each individual assembly and allows for easier manufacturing and maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The motor assembly is designed as a universal power source that can drive different planer blades for various cutting tasks. The same motor assembly can be used with different planer assemblies, reducing the need for multiple specialized devices and simplifying the overall system design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If a block plane is used, then excellent control is achieved, but manual force must be applied repetitively reducing productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecontrolVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The planer blade is mounted on a movable carriage that can be adjusted along the length of the planer housing. The depth adjustment assembly allows the blade to be positioned at different depths relative to the work surface, providing dynamic control over cutting depth while the motor provides automated cutting power, eliminating the need for repetitive manual forcing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The motor assembly acts as an intermediary that converts electrical energy into mechanical motion to drive the planer blade. This intermediary power source eliminates the need for direct manual application of force while maintaining precise control through the depth adjustment mechanism and movable carriage system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If a block plane blade is used, then cutting performance is good, but frequent sharpening and disassembly is required losing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting performanceVSAvoidblade maintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The planer blade is designed as a replaceable, inexpensive component that can be quickly swapped when dull. Instead of requiring time-consuming sharpening and honing processes, users can simply remove the worn blade and install a fresh one, significantly reducing maintenance time and preserving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The blade sharpening function is extracted from the system entirely. The blade is designed to be easily removed and replaced rather than sharpened in place. This extraction of the sharpening process eliminates the need for disassembly and complex sharpening operations, allowing for quick blade replacement to maintain cutting performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

5Power

If a power planer with both hands operation is used, then cutting power is sufficient, but the operation feels different and less intuitive than a traditional block plane

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting powerVSAvoidoperational familiarity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The separation of the motor assembly from the planer assembly allows the planer to be operated with one hand like a traditional block plane. The motor assembly can be positioned on the work surface or held in one hand while the planer assembly is manipulated with the other hand, providing familiar single-handed operation while still delivering powered cutting performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3230026B1Compact planer
Publication Date: 2022.09.28 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP3230026B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3230026B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3230026B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A power tool includes a housing, and a cutting assembly supported by the housing. The power tool further includes a motor assembly operatively coupled to the cutting assembly and arranged on a first side of the housing. The power tool further includes an actuator operatively coupled to the motor assembly and configured to actuate the motor assembly. The actuator is arranged on a second side of the housing that is opposite the first side of the housing.