Compact Cabin Attendant Seat With Folding Shock-Absorbing Shell

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional aircraft cabin crew attendant seats are heavy, lack efficient folding mechanisms, and do not incorporate effective shock load absorption systems, which hinders weight reduction, cleanliness, and user comfort.

Innovation Solution

A compact aircraft cabin crew attendant seat made primarily from carbon fiber reinforced composite materials, featuring a clamshell folding design that encloses primary components and seat cushions, and incorporates a vertical shock absorption system with hydraulic and/or friction dampers, along with a self-retracting harness for enhanced safety and ergonomics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If conventional materials (metal, plastic) are used for the seat structure, then the seat provides sufficient strength and durability, but the weight of the seat increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of the seatVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials (carbon fiber reinforced polymer, Kevlar, or other high-strength-to-weight ratio materials) for the seat shell and structural components. This resolves the contradiction by providing sufficient structural strength while significantly reducing the weight compared to conventional metal or plastic materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If the seat is designed with exposed components and cushions, then the seat provides easy access and visibility, but cleanliness and compactness are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleanliness and compactnessVSAvoidaccessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the seat cushion, backrest, and shell into a unified enclosed structure. The cushion is integrated within the shell rather than being a separate exposed component, which maintains cleanliness and compactness while still providing full seating functionality when deployed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If the seat is designed without shock absorption system, then the device complexity is reduced, but the safety and comfort during crashes is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety during crashVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates a shock absorption system with energy-absorbing elements (such as springs, dampers, or crushable structures) pre-installed in the seat legs or connection points. This provides crash protection in advance before any accident occurs, resolving the contradiction by ensuring safety while maintaining relatively simple integration into the seat structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Ease of operation

If the seat is designed with large depth, then the seating comfort is improved, but the space requirement and folded compactness increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseating comfortVSAvoidseat depth
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a telescopic or articulated seat pan design that can extend to provide adequate seating depth when in use, and retract or fold to minimize depth when not in use. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by providing both comfort during operation and compactness for storage or emergency evacuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution significantly reduces the weight of the seat, improves cleanliness and ergonomics by folding into a compact envelope, and provides effective shock absorption during crashes, enhancing user comfort and safety.

Implementation Method 1

carbon fiber reinforced composite as the main structural material to significantly reduce the weight

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectComposite materials: Composite Materials

Implementation Method 2

incorporates a shock load absorption system into the seat structure by the utilization of hydraulic and/or friction dampers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic damping: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 3

incorporates a shock load absorption system into the seat structure by the utilization of hydraulic and/or friction dampers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction damping: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3010376B1Compact aircraft cabin attendant seat
Publication Date: 2018.08.29 BE AEROSPACE INC
  • EP3010376B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3010376B1 patent drawingFigure 3~6
  • EP3010376B1 patent drawingFigure 7~8

AI summary

A compact aircraft cabin crew attendant seat (10) includes a seat back portion (12), a shell (14) that encloses the seat back portion (12), a head rest portion (16) mounted to a top portion of the seat back portion (12), and a seat portion or squab (26). The seat portion (26) includes a hinge (28) that is slidably attached within a vertical slot (24) in the shell (14), allowing the seat portion (26) to be folded down in an open position of the crew attendant seat (10) for use. The seat portion hinge (28) moves vertically between an upper position in the compact closed position and a lower position in the open position. A major portion of the crew attendant seat (10) is formed from high strength carbon fiber reinforced composite to reduces weight. A vertical shock absorption system is configured to absorb energy during a crash landing.