Compact Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Without Tube Sheets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shell and tube heat exchangers face challenges in maximizing heat transfer efficiency and minimizing pressure drop, particularly in applications with low pressure differentials, due to the need for baffles and tube sheets, which restrict fluid flow and increase complexity.

Innovation Solution

The use of heat exchange tubes arranged to form a hypocycloidal enclosure gap with a pitch of substantially 1, eliminating the need for baffles and tube sheets, and employing tessellating tube ends for self-support and secure connections, allowing for improved fluid flow and reduced pressure drops.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional heat exchanger designs are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but cleaning accessibility and efficiency are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidcleaning accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger is divided into multiple modules, each comprising a support structure with integrated cleaning feature receptacles. This segmentation allows each module to be independently manufactured and assembled, maintaining manufacturing simplicity while enabling effective cleaning access through the modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Cleaning feature receptacles are introduced as intermediary structures that facilitate the cleaning process. These receptacles receive cleaning tools and provide structured access points, acting as mediators between the operator and the heat exchanger surfaces that require cleaning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If complex cleaning features are added to improve cleaning accessibility, then cleaning efficiency improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning efficiencyVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cleaning features are merged with the support structures, creating integrated units where the cleaning functionality is built into the existing structural framework. This merging avoids adding separate, complex cleaning systems while still providing effective cleaning access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The support structures are designed to serve multiple functions: structural support and cleaning feature integration. The cleaning feature receptacles can accommodate various cleaning tools, providing universal cleaning capability across different heat exchanger configurations without requiring tool-specific structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If modular design with multiple support structures is implemented, then cleaning accessibility improves, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning accessibilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger is divided into multiple modules, each comprising a support structure with integrated cleaning feature receptacles. This segmentation allows each module to be independently manufactured and assembled, maintaining manufacturing simplicity while enabling effective cleaning access through the modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular design allows for parameter standardization across modules, where key dimensions and interface specifications are maintained consistently. This standardization simplifies manufacturing by enabling repeated production of identical components while still providing cleaning accessibility through the modular configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances heat transfer area and reduces pressure drops, resulting in a more compact and efficient heat exchanger design with increased performance and reduced volume.

Implementation Method 1

a first heat transfer fluid is transferable across a wall of the housing to a second heat transfer fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentEP4627274B1Heat exchanger
Publication Date: 2026.05.06 BAE SYSTEMS PLC
  • EP4627274B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP4627274B1 patent drawingFigure 2~4a
  • EP4627274B1 patent drawingFigure 4b~5

AI summary

The present invention relates to shell and tube heat exchangers, specifically to compact heat exchangers without the need for a tube sheet. There is provided a shell and tube heat exchanger having an outer shell and a series of heat exchange tubes located therein, said shell comprising a shell side fluid inlet and a shell side fluid outlet for transfer of a first fluid, said tubes, capable in use of permitting flow of a second fluid, said tubes comprising a first end and second end, wherein said tubes are arranged such that they are touching, forming a hypocycloidal enclosure gap, which provides a path for the transfer of said first fluid, wherein said tubes comprise a first region of reduced diameter located proximate to said shell side fluid inlet nozzle and second region of reduced diameter located proximate shell side fluid outlet nozzle, to allow said first fluid to form a flow path through said hypocycloidial enclosure gap.