Compacted Fragment Warhead Void Elimination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Pre-formed fragment warheads face challenges in achieving high packing density and fragment velocity due to void spaces between randomly packed fragments, leading to reduced effectiveness and increased manufacturing costs.

Innovation Solution

The technique involves compacting pre-formed metal fragments under high pressure to remove void spaces, using a punch and die press mold to deform and bond the fragments, resulting in a rigid, void-free structure with improved packing density and fragment velocity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If pre-formed fragments are randomly packaged in a warhead, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but packing density decreases and void spaces create escape channels for explosive gases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidpacking density
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The fragments are pre-formed with adhesive coating applied before packaging, preparing them in advance for both random packing and subsequent bonding. This preliminary adhesive application enables the fragments to bond effectively after random packaging, resolving the contradiction between random packing (low cost) and structural integrity (high density without escape channels).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The warhead combines metal fragments with an adhesive binder material to create a composite structure. The adhesive fills void spaces between randomly packed fragments and bonds them together, achieving high packing density and eliminating escape channels while maintaining the simplicity of random packaging and low manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If pre-formed fragments are randomly packaged in a warhead, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but fragment velocity decreases due to escape channels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidfragment velocity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

Adhesive coating is applied to fragments before packaging, preparing them to form a bonded structure that will prevent gas escape channels. This preliminary action ensures that the random packaging process maintains both cost-effectiveness and fragment velocity performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The adhesive-bonded composite structure eliminates escape channels between fragments, ensuring high fragment velocity upon detonation while maintaining the cost benefits of random packaging. The composite material fills gaps and creates a unified structure that channels explosive energy efficiently to the fragments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Speed

If unitary structure is deeply etched to form fragments, then fragment velocity improves by eliminating escape channels, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefragment velocityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of etching a unitary structure to create fragments, the warhead uses pre-formed discrete fragments that are simply packaged and bonded. This segmentation approach achieves the same escape-channel elimination effect as etching but through a much simpler, lower-cost manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The adhesive-bonded composite of randomly packed fragments provides an alternative to etched unitary structures. The composite material fills voids and bonds fragments together, eliminating escape channels without requiring complex etching operations, thus achieving high fragment velocity at low manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Strength

If polyurethane matrix is used to hold fragments, then fragments are held together, but void spaces remain and provide escape channels for gases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidpacking density
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The adhesive creates strong bonds between fragments at contact points, providing structural integrity. While the adhesive occupies some void space, the key parameter change is the bonding strength that holds fragments together as a unified structure, preventing gas escape channels while maintaining reasonable packing density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The adhesive-bonded fragment composite replaces the polyurethane matrix approach. The adhesive creates a bonded network that provides structural integrity and eliminates continuous escape channels, while allowing higher packing density compared to matrix-embedded fragments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances fragment velocity by eliminating escape channels for explosive gases, achieving higher packing density and reducing manufacturing costs, resulting in a more effective and cost-efficient fragmenting warhead.

Implementation Method 1

compressing the fragments together in the press mold to form the fragmenting structure as a rigid and substantially void-free structure of compression-deformed, mutually adhering metal fragments

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

The fragments are made of a ductile metal that deforms under the applied pressure, causing the fragments to better conform to each other and reduce/remove void space

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasticity: Plasticity

Implementation Method 3

Bonding may be provided by coating the fragments with thin adhesive before compaction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 4

explosive charge of the warhead

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDetonation: Detonation

Implementation Method 5

the explosive gases transfer their energy to the fragments, launching the fragments at very high velocity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy transfer:

Data Source

PatentUS10288394B2Warhead fragmenting structure of compacted fragments
Publication Date: 2019.05.14 TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC
  • US10288394B2 patent drawing
  • US10288394B2 patent drawing
  • US10288394B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of making a fragmenting structure for an explosive device includes placing a volume of fragments of a deformable metal material into a press mold, the fragments having sufficient surface adhesiveness to adhere to each other upon being compressed together, e.g., by coating the fragments with adhesive. The fragments are compressed together in the press mold to form the fragmenting structure as a rigid and substantially void-free structure of compression-deformed, mutually adhering metal fragments, the fragmenting structure being sized and shaped for subsequent incorporation into the explosive device. An explosive device includes an explosive charge and a fragmenting structure adjacent to the explosive charge, the fragmenting structure being a rigid and substantially void-free structure of compression-deformed, mutually adhering metal fragments. The structure may have been manufactured by the disclosed method.