Compactor Wheel Guard Tooth With Interlocking Wear Cap

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Landfill compactor vehicle teeth face high stress and wear due to heavy loading and operational demands, requiring high structural strength and durability with secure attachment to the vehicle wheels, while also needing to withstand frequent replacement.

Innovation Solution

A tooth design comprising a base and cap with interlocking retention features, where the base is weldable and made from materials like A3 tool steel, and the cap is made from high-wearing materials like white iron or high alloy steel, using a twin-shot casting process to secure the cap to the base with molten metal retention features.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If teeth are made from high-strength materials and securely connected to withstand high loading forces, then structural strength and reliability improve, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tooth is divided into two separate components: a base made from weldable material (such as A3 tool steel) and a cap made from high-wearing material (such as white iron or high alloy steel). These segments are manufactured separately and then joined together through welding, allowing each component to be optimized for its specific function while simplifying the overall manufacturing process compared to creating a single complex high-strength tooth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tooth combines two different materials with complementary properties: a weldable base material providing structural integrity and attachment capability, and a hard-wearing cap material providing surface durability and resistance to abrasion from waste material. This composite structure resolves the contradiction by allowing each material to perform its optimal function without requiring the entire tooth to be made from difficult-to-manufacture high-strength material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If teeth are made hard wearing to resist wear, then durability improves, but ease of manufacture and cost decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidease of manufacture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of making the entire tooth from hard-wearing material, only the cap portion that contacts the waste material is made from high-wearing material (white iron or high alloy steel). The base portion is made from easier-to-manufacture weldable material. This local application of hard-wearing properties maintains durability where needed while significantly improving ease of manufacture and reducing cost for the non-contact portions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The tooth combines two different materials with complementary properties: a weldable base material providing structural integrity and attachment capability, and a hard-wearing cap material providing surface durability and resistance to abrasion from waste material. This composite structure resolves the contradiction by allowing each material to perform its optimal function without requiring the entire tooth to be made from difficult-to-manufacture high-strength material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If teeth are designed with secure attachment to withstand high loading forces, then reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment securityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tooth is divided into a base and cap that are separately manufactured and then joined through welding. The base includes features like an underside configured to engage the wheel and retention features for securing the cap. This segmentation allows for simplified manufacturing of individual components while achieving secure attachment through the welding process, reducing overall structural complexity compared to monolithic designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The base and cap are merged through welding to create a unified tooth structure that maintains secure attachment while withstanding high loading forces. The welding process combines the two separate components into a single integrated unit that preserves the advantages of both materials and structures without requiring complex mechanical fastening systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances structural strength, durability, and wear resistance, reducing the need for frequent replacements and improving attachment security, while also reducing material and manufacturing costs through the use of a cavity in the base and optimized thermal management.

Implementation Method 1

the retention features of the base and cap interlock with one another to secure the cap to the base

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical interlocking: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 2

a cavity is defined in the underside of the base... optimized thermal management

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal mass reduction: Heat Sink

Data Source

PatentUS11828036B2Guard for compactor vehicle and associated method
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 BERNARD MCCARTNEY
  • US11828036B2 patent drawing
  • US11828036B2 patent drawing
  • US11828036B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A guard for a compactor vehicle that includes a base and a cap. The base comprises a body and a retention feature. The body defines an underside, configured to engage a wheel of the compactor vehicle, and an opposing cap-facing side. The cap comprises an outer surface and a retention feature. The outer surface defines a compaction surface. The retention features of the base and cap interlock with one another to secure the cap to the base. A cavity is defined in the underside of the base.