Compactor Navigation via Real-Time Compaction State Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current compactor machine operation methods are inefficient and labor-intensive due to reliance on operator judgment and lack of precise guidance on work material compaction responses, leading to uneven compaction and unnecessary energy expenditure.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize sensors to detect aberrant compaction responses across different regions of a work area, generating navigation signals to optimize the compactor's travel path and reduce unnecessary passes, thereby improving operational efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If uniform coverage approach is used to compact work material, then compactor machine coverage is improved, but energy consumption increases and compaction precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompaction uniformityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from uniform coverage to localized targeted compaction by using sensors to detect compaction state variations across different regions. The compactor machine applies compaction forces only where needed based on real-time feedback, with each region receiving customized compaction treatment according to its specific requirements rather than applying the same uniform approach everywhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback through sensors that monitor compaction state, work material properties, and compactor performance in real-time. This feedback loop enables the control system to adjust compaction parameters and navigate the machine to regions requiring additional compaction, eliminating the need for predetermined uniform coverage patterns and reducing wasted energy on already-compacted areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If sophisticated electronic positioning systems are used to track compactor coverage, then position accuracy is improved, but the system fails to address work material compaction response variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition accuracyVSAvoidcompaction quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges electronic positioning systems with sensors that directly measure work material compaction response. By combining position tracking with real-time compaction state detection, the system achieves both accurate location information and actual compaction quality measurement, allowing the control system to navigate to specific regions based on both position and compaction needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from compaction response sensors to supplement position data, creating a comprehensive control system that responds to actual material conditions rather than just predetermined paths. The feedback mechanism allows the system to adjust navigation and compaction parameters based on real-time material response, ensuring quality compaction even in regions with varying properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If operator judgment and visual markers are used to guide compaction, then system complexity is reduced, but productivity decreases and human error increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework progressVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables the compactor machine to autonomously determine its own navigation path and compaction requirements through integrated sensors and control systems. The machine self-adjusts its operation based on real-time feedback from compaction state detection, eliminating the need for continuous operator intervention and visual marker placement while maintaining high productivity and reducing human error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual operator judgment and visual marker systems with electronic sensors and automated control. This substitution of mechanical and human-based guidance with electronic detection and automated navigation increases productivity and consistency while managing system complexity through integrated control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS7731450B2Method of operating a compactor machine via path planning based on compaction state data and mapping information
Publication Date: 2010.06.08 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US7731450B2 patent drawing
  • US7731450B2 patent drawing
  • US7731450B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of operating a compactor machine includes moving the compacting machine within a work area and determining a compaction response disconformity exists between at least two regions of the work area. The method includes generating a compactor navigation signal responsive to the compaction response disconformity. A method of compacting a work area may include determining a work material compaction response associated with at least one region of the work area is aberrant, and maneuvering the compactor machine within the work area responsive to a signal associated with the aberrant compaction response. A system for compacting a work area includes a compactor machine and an electronic controller configured via a compactor maneuvering control algorithm to detect an aberrant work material compaction response in a region of the work area and responsively generate a compactor navigation signal.