Comparative Fuel Probe for Aircraft Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fuel-level detection systems in aircraft, particularly capacitive fuel gauges, face challenges due to the need to account for various factors like fuel blend properties, temperature, corrosion, and humidity, leading to complexity and weight issues, and require redundant mechanical systems for reliability.

Innovation Solution

A comparative fuel probe system that uses a combination of capacitive and float-type sensors to determine a correction factor, simplifying the calculation of fuel levels by comparing capacitive readings with float readings, thereby reducing the complexity and weight of sensors needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If capacitive fuel gauges are used to detect fuel level, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to the need to account for multiple factors like fuel blend properties, temperature, corrosion, and humidity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel level detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A correction factor is introduced as an intermediary element that encapsulates the complex relationships between fuel level, fuel blend properties, temperature, corrosion, and humidity. Instead of directly measuring and processing multiple individual parameters, the system uses the correction factor as a mediator to adjust capacitive readings, thereby simplifying the overall system complexity while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter being processed from multiple individual factors (fuel blend properties, temperature, corrosion, humidity) to a single corrected capacitive reading. By applying the correction factor to the raw capacitive measurement, the system transforms complex multi-parameter data into a simplified single parameter that directly indicates fuel level, reducing processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple sensors and processing equipment are used to account for various factors, then measurement precision is improved, but weight increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel level detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor and processing equipment weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the complex correction logic from the physical sensor assembly and encapsulates it in a mathematical correction factor. This allows the system to achieve high measurement precision without requiring additional physical sensors for each factor (temperature, humidity, corrosion, etc.), thereby significantly reducing the weight of the detection system while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If a mechanical drip stick system is added as redundant backup, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel level detection reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces the mechanical drip stick system with an electronic correction factor-based system. Instead of using a mechanical probe that physically contacts the fuel, the system uses capacitive sensing combined with mathematical corrections to achieve reliable fuel level detection. This substitution eliminates the need for mechanical redundancy while maintaining or improving reliability through electronic means.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If numerous factors are accounted for in calculation, then measurement precision is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to complex calculations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel level detection accuracyVSAvoidcalculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The correction factor is calculated and determined in advance based on the specific fuel tank conditions, fuel blend properties, and environmental factors. By performing this complex calculation beforehand, the system transforms the operational phase into a simple application of the pre-computed correction factor to the capacitive reading, thereby maintaining measurement precision while significantly improving ease of operation during actual fuel level detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides accurate fuel level determination by accounting for multiple factors in a single correction factor, reducing the weight and complexity of the detection system while ensuring reliability, including in high-intensity radiation fields.

Implementation Method 1

Capacitive fuel gauges operate by measuring the capacitance between various probes. The fuel is, in essence, working as the dielectric between the probes.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

The fuel is, in essence, working as the dielectric between the probes.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDielectric: Dielectric

Implementation Method 3

a float assembly configured to provide a comparative float reading

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Data Source

PatentUS10697817B2Comparative fuel-level detection system
Publication Date: 2020.06.30 CIES INC
  • US10697817B2 patent drawing
  • US10697817B2 patent drawing
  • US10697817B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fuel-level detection system is configured to determine a fuel level in a fuel system. A comparative fuel probe is associated with the fuel system and includes a capacitive probe assembly configured to provide a comparative capacitive reading, and a float assembly configured to provide a comparative float reading. A comparator is configured to receive the comparative capacitive reading and to receive the comparative float reading, and to determine a corrective factor based at least in part on the comparative capacitive reading and the comparative float reading. A set of capacitive probes is associated with the fuel system. The fuel level in the fuel system is determined by comparing each local capacitive reading from each capacitive probe in the set of capacitive probes with the corrective factor.