Comparative Query Interpretation for Accurate Knowledge Retrieval

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computing systems face challenges in generating useful information from stored data due to the volume and variability of data, as well as ambiguities in language interpretation, leading to inefficiencies in pattern recognition and grammatical analysis.

Innovation Solution

A computing system that utilizes AI servers to ingest content, extract knowledge, and interact with user devices to facilitate the generation and utilization of knowledge, employing modules like collections and identigen intelligence to interpret queries and gather content, ensuring quality thresholds are met before providing responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If pattern recognition techniques and statistical reasoning are used to process text, then interpretation accuracy improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterpretation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments text processing into distinct modules: pattern recognition module for matching word patterns, statistical reasoning module for probability-based interpretation, and grammar analysis module for structural validation. Each module handles specific aspects of text interpretation independently, improving accuracy while managing computational complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer that translates ambiguous text into structured data representations before further processing. This intermediary representation layer acts as a buffer between raw text input and final interpretation, reducing the direct computational burden while maintaining interpretation accuracy through multiple processing stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If grammar based techniques are used to analyze word distribution, then sentence construction accuracy improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesentence construction accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary grammatical analysis by pre-classifying words into grammatical types (nouns, verbs, adjectives, etc.) and pre-identifying valid grammatical structures before actual sentence construction. This preliminary preparation reduces the time required during actual sentence building while maintaining construction accuracy through pre-validat ed grammatical rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of grammatical analysis from exhaustive validation to selective validation, focusing only on critical grammatical constraints for each sentence type. By adjusting the depth and scope of grammatical checking based on sentence complexity and context, the system maintains accuracy while reducing overall processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12524686B2Generating comparison information
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 ENTIGENLOGIC LLC
  • US12524686B2 patent drawing
  • US12524686B2 patent drawing
  • US12524686B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method performed by a computing device includes generating a comparative query entigen group set based on a comparative query in accordance with identigen rules, where the comparative query entigen group set represents a most likely interpretation of the comparative query. The method further includes obtaining a first response entigen group from a knowledge database based on a first comparative query entigen group of the comparative query entigen group set. The method further includes obtaining a second response entigen group from the knowledge database based on a second comparative query entigen group of the comparative query entigen group set. The method further includes generating a comparative response based on the first response entigen group and the second response entigen group.