Comparator Current Limiting for Low-Distortion ADC Timing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional comparators in asynchronous ADCs suffer from high delay distortion and inconsistent current draw due to their design, which affects the accuracy of analog-to-digital conversion by introducing inaccuracies in the timestamp and digital signal generation.

Innovation Solution

A multi-stage comparator network with current limiters and self-biasing capabilities is introduced, featuring transistors with differential inputs and outputs, and a common mode voltage system to minimize delay and ensure consistent current flow, thereby achieving high gain and low distortion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional comparator design is used in asynchronous ADCs, then the conversion process can be implemented, but high delay distortion occurs and current draw becomes inconsistent, affecting accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion accuracyVSAvoidtimestamp accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The comparator employs dynamic current adjustment by responding to the common mode voltage level. The current draw is dynamically modified based on the input signal characteristics, allowing the comparator to adapt its operating point. This dynamic behavior reduces delay distortion by optimizing the transistor operating regions during different signal conditions, thereby improving timestamp accuracy while maintaining conversion precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the operating parameters of the comparator by introducing common mode voltage sensing and response mechanisms. The comparator monitors the common mode voltage level and adjusts its internal biasing conditions accordingly. This parameter change approach allows the comparator to maintain consistent performance across varying input conditions, reducing delay variation and improving both conversion accuracy and timestamp precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Speed

If high speed operation is implemented to reduce time delay, then conversion speed improves, but power consumption increases due to higher current draw

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion speedVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The comparator implements dynamic current control that adjusts the operating current based on the common mode voltage level and signal conditions. Rather than operating at a fixed high current to ensure speed, the comparator dynamically scales its current draw to match the actual conversion needs. This allows high-speed operation when necessary while reducing power consumption during lower-demand conditions, resolving the contradiction between speed and energy usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention modifies the current operating parameter dynamically by sensing common mode voltage and adjusting bias currents accordingly. This parameter change strategy enables the comparator to operate at optimal speed only when required, rather than maintaining constant high current. The result is improved conversion speed when needed while significantly reducing average power consumption through adaptive current management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If continuous mode operation is used for wide-band input signals, then bandwidth coverage improves, but delay variation increases affecting timestamp accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth coverageVSAvoidtimestamp accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The comparator uses dynamic adaptation to common mode voltage changes to maintain consistent delay characteristics across wide bandwidths. By continuously monitoring and responding to common mode voltage levels, the comparator adjusts its internal operating conditions to compensate for signal-dependent delay variations. This dynamic response allows wide bandwidth coverage while maintaining timestamp accuracy through real-time delay compensation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs parameter changes in the comparator's biasing conditions based on common mode voltage sensing. This allows the comparator to optimize its delay characteristics for different input signal conditions across the wide bandwidth range. By adjusting operating parameters dynamically, the system achieves both wide bandwidth coverage and consistent timestamp accuracy, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11463077B2Low power comparator
Publication Date: 2022.10.04 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US11463077B2 patent drawing
  • US11463077B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A comparator includes an input stage having a differential input and an output, wherein the voltage at the output is in response to the voltage at the input. The comparator further includes a current limiter for limiting the current flow through the input stage, wherein the current flow through the input stage is in response to the voltage at the input.