Comparator Architecture With Inverter-Assisted Fast Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional comparator architectures are unable to switch quickly, resulting in a delay of approximately four hundred picoseconds for the output to change from logic-0 to logic-1 in response to a voltage threshold being exceeded, which hampers the power management system's ability to adjust the supply voltage effectively.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a comparator architecture with a high-gain stage and an inverter stage, where the inverter stage assists the high-gain stage by providing or draining current, and includes a resistor to enhance the speed of the comparator by allowing the high-gain node voltage to rise or fall more quickly, reducing the delay to less than one hundred picoseconds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If conventional comparator architecture is used, then device complexity is reduced, but switching speed is slow (400 picoseconds delay)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomparator switching speedVSAvoidcomparator architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The comparator is divided into two distinct stages: a high-gain stage that amplifies the voltage difference between input and reference voltages, and an inverter stage that provides current to accelerate the response. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized for its specific function, achieving faster overall switching speed while maintaining manageable complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The inverter stage dynamically provides or drains current from the high-gain node based on the operating conditions, enabling the comparator to adapt its switching speed to the specific voltage transition requirements. This dynamic current provision reduces the fixed 400 picosecond delay to less than 100 picoseconds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of time

If conventional comparator architecture is used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but response time is slow (400 picoseconds)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomparator response timeVSAvoidcomparator architecture implementation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the comparator into high-gain and inverter stages, the design achieves faster response time through optimized current control while maintaining ease of manufacture through modular implementation. Each stage can be independently designed and fabricated using standard CMOS processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the operational parameters of the comparator by introducing a resistor in the inverter stage that controls the current flow to the high-gain node. This parameter change enables faster voltage transitions at the output without requiring complex manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If faster switching is achieved through architecture modification, then power management system speed is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower management system adjustment speedVSAvoidcomparator circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The segmented architecture with high-gain and inverter stages enables the power management system to detect voltage threshold crossings faster, improving productivity. The segmentation isolates the complexity to specific functional blocks that can be independently optimized and manufactured.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The inverter stage serves multiple functions: it inverts the signal from the high-gain stage, provides current to accelerate the response, and enables faster switching. This multi-functionality improves power management system speed without proportionally increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This architecture significantly reduces the response time of the comparator, enabling faster adjustments to the power supply voltage and thereby enhancing the speed and performance of the power management system.

Implementation Method 1

a resistor couples the high-gain node of the first stage to a common drain of the inverter transistor pair and is configured to provide and/or draw current to and/or from the high-gain node of the first stage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical Resistance: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS10461738B1Comparator architecture and related methods
Publication Date: 2019.10.29 QUALCOMM INC
  • US10461738B1 patent drawing
  • US10461738B1 patent drawing
  • US10461738B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system is disclosed. The system includes a first stage configured to receive VIN and VREF, the first stage including an input transistor pair, wherein the input voltage is coupled to the input transistor pair, the input transistor pair is coupled to ground, and the input transistor pair includes at a common drain a high-gain node having a voltage VHGN. The system further include a second stage coupled to the high-gain node and configured to generate VOUT based on a difference between VIN and VREF, the second stage comprising a resistor and an inverter transistor pair, wherein the gates of the inverter transistor pair are coupled to the high-gain node of the first stage and the resistor couples the high-gain node of first stage to a common drain of the inverter transistor pair and is configured to provide and/or draw current to and/or from the high-gain node of first stage.