Compartmentalized Insect Trap with Segmented Entry Structures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional insect traps are ineffective for trapping multiple species of insects due to territorial and repulsive behaviors, leading to close-proximity interactions and reduced trapping efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The design includes a compartmentalized entrapment chamber with separate entry structures and tapered guides, featuring external fins and crown structures to separate insects and minimize interactions, along with multiple entry apertures and attractant plumes to attract and trap multiple species simultaneously.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional insect traps are used to trap multiple species, then the trap structure remains simple, but trapping efficiency decreases due to territorial and repulsive behaviors between species

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrapping efficiencyVSAvoidtrap structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The trap is divided into multiple separate compartments, each with its own entry structure and attractant system. This segmentation allows different insect species to be trapped in isolated spaces, preventing territorial conflicts and repulsive interactions between species, thereby improving overall trapping efficiency for multiple species simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces vertical separation through multiple compartments arranged in different spatial levels, with each compartment having its own entry apertures and attractant plumes. This dimensional arrangement allows independent operation of each trapping zone, enabling simultaneous trapping of multiple species without interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple entry apertures are provided for different species, then trapping versatility improves, but insect interactions and interference increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrapping versatilityVSAvoidinsect interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Each entry aperture is assigned to a specific compartment, creating dedicated access points for different species. The fins and crown structures within each compartment further segment the space, ensuring that insects entering through different apertures remain separated and do not interact negatively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each compartment is designed with specific local characteristics including dedicated entry apertures, fins, and crown structures tailored to the particular species it targets. This localized design allows each entry aperture to function optimally for its intended species while minimizing interference from other species using different apertures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If attractant plumes are used to lure insects, then trapping effectiveness increases, but the complexity of managing multiple attractants increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrapping effectivenessVSAvoidattractant management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each compartment has its own dedicated attractant plume system, allowing species-specific attractants to be deployed independently. This segmentation means that attractants for different species do not conflict with each other, and each can be optimized for its target species without managing complex interactions between multiple attractant types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each compartment contains attractant plumes with specific chemical compositions tailored to the particular insect species targeted in that compartment. This localized attractant strategy simplifies management by allowing selective deployment of appropriate attractants for each zone rather than managing a single complex multi-species attractant system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances the trapping efficiency by allowing multiple insect species to be trapped without interference, reducing the number of traps required to achieve a desired level of efficacy.

Implementation Method 1

the attractant is a volatile attractant formed into a solid with a polyurethane matrix, such that the attractant will evaporate and escape from the matrix over a period of time

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

the volatile olfactory attractant mixes with vapors from a chemical attractant and/or water in a separate container, the mixed vapors exiting the trap in a plume

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVapor formation and movement: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS8056282B2Insect trap with behavior modifying features
Publication Date: 2011.11.15 STERLING INT INC
  • US8056282B2 patent drawing
  • US8056282B2 patent drawing
  • US8056282B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An insect trap (100, 200) having an entrapment chamber (110, 210) comprising one or more compartments, a tapered guide (130, 260) extending into each compartment, and an entry structure (120, 240) providing insect access to each compartment. The tapered guides optionally include a plurality of projections defining a crown structure for discouraging insect egress from the trap. The entry structures each define a plurality of entry apertures or entryways that are physically separated such that interactions between insects at different entryways is reduced or eliminated.