Compensated Spectacle Lens Digital Twins for Dioptric Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for calculating optical systems fail to ensure that the dioptric function of manufactured optical systems accurately matches the calculated optical systems, necessitating a concrete modifying step to achieve equivalence.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the combination of a compensated surface with a predefined digital twin of a spectacle lens, utilizing discrete z positions or mathematical descriptions of correction surfaces to optimize optical power errors, ensuring the dioptric function of the manufactured system matches the calculated system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If existing methods for calculating optical systems are used, then the calculation process is relatively simple, but the dioptric function of the manufactured optical system does not accurately match the calculated optical system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedioptric function accuracyVSAvoidcalculation method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The method performs preliminary modification of the calculated optical system before manufacturing by determining a modifying surface that compensates for expected manufacturing deviations. This preliminary action ensures that the manufactured system's dioptric function matches the intended design, resolving the accuracy issue without requiring complex post-manufacturing adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The modifying surface acts as an intermediary element between the calculated optical system and the manufactured system. By introducing this intermediate modifying surface, the method bridges the gap between theoretical calculations and actual manufacturing, enabling accurate dioptric function transfer while maintaining a structured calculation approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If a modifying step is introduced to ensure dioptric function equivalence, then the accuracy of the manufactured system improves, but the manufacturing process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedioptric function equivalenceVSAvoidmanufacturing process simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The method extracts the modification requirement from the overall manufacturing process by separately determining the modifying surface through dedicated calculation steps. This extraction allows the modification to be handled as a distinct computational task, simplifying the integration into the manufacturing workflow while ensuring dioptric function equivalence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The method creates a modified version of the original optical system surfaces by applying the determining step to generate modifying surfaces. This copying approach with systematic modification ensures that the essential optical characteristics are preserved while achieving the required dioptric function equivalence, making the process more manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If multiple calculation steps including optimization are performed, then the optical power error is reduced, but the calculation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical power errorVSAvoidcalculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The method applies optimization to reduce optical power error but allows for selective application based on requirements. The determining step can be applied partially or iteratively, enabling the system to achieve sufficient accuracy without always performing exhaustive optimization, thus balancing precision with calculation time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The method incorporates feedback mechanisms where the calculated modifying surfaces are evaluated for their effect on optical power error. This feedback loop allows the system to adjust the optimization process dynamically, reducing unnecessary calculations while ensuring that optical power error is reduced to acceptable levels, thereby minimizing calculation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4600719A1Method being configured for calculating by a computer a compensated digital twin of a spectacle lens
Publication Date: 2025.08.13 CARL ZEISS VISION INTERNATIONAL GMBH
  • EP4600719A1 patent drawingFigure 1a1~1h1
  • EP4600719A1 patent drawingFigure 1a2~1h2
  • EP4600719A1 patent drawingFigure 1a3~1h3

AI summary

The invention discloses a method being configured for calculating by a computer a compensated digital twin of a spectacle lens for the purpose of a use of the compensated digital twin for a manufacture of the spectacle lens, said compensated digital twin being based on a predefined digital twin of a spectacle lens, the method is characterized in the step of: - combining a compensated surface of a predefined digital twin of a spectacle lens with a respective other surface of said predefined digital twin resulting in said compensated digital twin.