Compensation Adjustment Visualization System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current information organization methods and data models do not provide an efficient way to visualize and compare compensation adjustments for employees, leading to increased time and resources required for compensation adjustments.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that identify merit groups for employees based on evaluations, apply compensation adjustment parameters to determine adjustments for each merit group, and display the impact of these adjustments in a compensation adjustment scenario.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If current information organization methods and data models are used to access compensation information, then basic compensation data can be retrieved, but the time and resources needed to perform compensation adjustments become greater than desired

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompensation adjustment efficiencyVSAvoidtime needed for compensation adjustments
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating and storing compensation adjustment scenarios before actual adjustments are needed. The compensation modeler pre-processes employee data, merit group classifications, and compensation parameters to create ready-to-apply adjustment scenarios, eliminating the need for time-consuming real-time calculations during compensation review periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a compensation modeler as an intermediary component that sits between the raw employee data and the final compensation decisions. This intermediary automatically processes data, applies adjustment parameters, and generates visualizations, reducing the manual time and resources needed for compensation adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If current information organization methods are used, then compensation data can be accessed, but visualization and comparison of compensation adjustments become difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompensation adjustment visualizationVSAvoidinformation organization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system adds a new dimensional layer by transforming traditional one-dimensional compensation data into multi-dimensional visualizations. The compensation modeler creates graphical representations that show compensation adjustments across multiple dimensions including employee merit groups, adjustment parameters, and financial impact, making complex data easily comparable and visualizable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses visual differentiation through color coding and graphical representations to show compensation adjustment impacts. Different merit groups and adjustment scenarios are visually distinguished through colored charts and graphs, enabling users to quickly compare compensation impacts without increasing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

3Ease of operation

If manual compensation adjustment methods are used, then basic compensation reviews can be performed, but significant computational resources and managerial time are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompensation adjustment operationVSAvoidcomputational resources for compensation adjustments
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The compensation modeler performs self-service by automatically processing employee data, classifying merit groups, applying adjustment parameters, and generating visualizations without requiring manual intervention. The system feeds on its own inputs (employee data, adjustment parameters) and produces outputs (compensation scenarios, impact analyses) autonomously, reducing the computational and temporal resources that would otherwise be required for manual processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250191078A1Dynamic organization structure model
Publication Date: 2025.06.12 ADP INC
  • US20250191078A1 patent drawing
  • US20250191078A1 patent drawing
  • US20250191078A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus visualizing compensation adjustments for employees of organization. A computer system identifies a number of merit groups for a group of employees based on employee evaluation for employees in the group of employees. The computer system identifies a number of compensation adjustment parameters. The computer system applies the number of compensation adjustment parameters to a compensation distribution of the group of employees to determine a compensation adjustment for each merit group. The computer system determines impact of the compensation adjustment on the compensation distribution of the group of employees. The computer system displays the impact of the compensation adjustment in a compensation adjustment scenario.