Compensation Coefficient Calculation for Optical Communication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In coherent optical communication, determining the tap coefficient for adaptive equalization is challenging due to potential divergence when calculating the inverse matrix, especially near the Nyquist condition, leading to decreased equalization accuracy and unnecessary high-frequency component amplification.

Innovation Solution

A compensation coefficient calculation method that involves extracting a known signal, adding pseudo-random numbers to it, and calculating the compensation coefficient by comparing the modified signal with a reference signal using a minimal mean square error method to prevent divergence and improve accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the inverse matrix is calculated to determine the tap coefficient for adaptive equalization, then the equalization can be performed, but the calculation may diverge especially near the Nyquist condition, leading to decreased equalization accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvergence of tap coefficient calculationVSAvoidequalization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

A regularization term (lambda * I) is introduced as an intermediary between the correlation matrix and the inverse calculation. This mediator prevents direct inversion of potentially singular or ill-conditioned matrices, ensuring convergence while maintaining calculation accuracy through the modified normal equation: Rxx * w + lambda * w = rxd

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The mathematical parameter of the inversion process is changed by adding a regularization parameter (lambda) to the diagonal elements of the correlation matrix. This parameter modification transforms the potentially divergent inverse matrix calculation into a stable pseudo-inverse calculation, ensuring convergence near the Nyquist condition while preserving equalization accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the tap coefficient is determined by minimizing the mean square error using the inverse matrix method, then the theoretical optimal solution is obtained, but unnecessary high-frequency components are raised in the FIR filter

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetap coefficient accuracyVSAvoidhigh-frequency component amplification
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The regularization parameter (lambda) is used to modify the frequency response characteristics of the filter. By adding lambda to the diagonal of the correlation matrix, the solution naturally suppresses high-frequency components that would otherwise be amplified, while still providing accurate tap coefficients for the important frequency ranges

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3402083B1Method for calculating compensation coefficient
Publication Date: 2020.05.13 NTT ELECTORNICS CORP
  • EP3402083B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3402083B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3402083B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

In a method in which a compensation coefficient calculating portion (6) calculates a compensation coefficient of a compensation portion (5) which compensates transmission characteristics of a signal, a known signal is extracted from the signal. Next, a pseudo-random number is added to the extracted known signal. Next, the compensation coefficient is calculated by comparing a true value of the known signal with the known signal to which the pseudo-random number is added.