Competency Assessment System Using Timestamped Video Evidence Indexing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for an efficient, valid, and independent competency-based assessment system that can accurately evaluate a candidate's ability to perform specific tasks, distinguishing between competency and qualification, particularly in employment, accreditation, and certification processes.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system for conducting competency-based assessments, which involves receiving and storing digital evidence of task performance, annotating and indexing video or audio files with timestamps, and linking descriptions to compliance criteria, allowing for efficient review and validation of competency levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If competency-based assessment is implemented to evaluate actual ability rather than qualifications, then assessment validity and reliability are improved, but assessment complexity and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment validityVSAvoidassessment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The assessment system is divided into distinct modules: evidence collection module, annotation module, indexing module, and verification module. Each module handles specific tasks independently, making the complex assessment process manageable and systematic while maintaining high reliability through structured segmentation of competencies into measurable indicators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary annotation system that bridges raw evidence and competency evaluation. Annotations serve as intermediate representations that link evidence to specific competency indicators, enabling systematic verification while reducing the complexity of directly evaluating raw evidence against competencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If digital evidence with annotations and timestamps is collected to demonstrate competency, then assessment precision and transparency are improved, but data management complexity and storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompetency evaluation precisionVSAvoiddata management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary annotation and indexing of evidence during the evidence collection phase, rather than during evaluation. Timestamps and metadata are automatically generated and attached to evidence items as they are collected, preparing the data structure in advance to facilitate precise competency evaluation without adding complexity during the assessment phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates structured copies of evidence data with embedded annotations and indexes. Instead of managing raw evidence directly, the system maintains organized copies with metadata layers that capture competency-relevant information, enabling precise evaluation while simplifying data management through standardized copy structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If multiple indicators and criteria are used to assess competency levels, then assessment comprehensiveness is improved, but assessment time and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment comprehensivenessVSAvoidassessment processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes the relationship between competency indicators, criteria, and evidence types during system setup. This preliminary configuration creates a lookup structure that enables rapid matching of evidence to competencies during assessment, maintaining comprehensive evaluation across multiple indicators while significantly reducing processing time through pre-computed associations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20220327491A1Method and system for competency based assessment
Publication Date: 2022.10.13 SMART ROBERT PETER
  • US20220327491A1 patent drawing
  • US20220327491A1 patent drawing
  • US20220327491A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is directed to a system and method for competency assessment and verification. The system includes a task and criteria module for defining tasks and criteria, an evidence module for receiving task and criteria evidence and an assessment module for assessing tasks and criteria based on the received evidence, in a web-based environment. The evidence module may include a documentary component and a video component for receiving documentary and video evidence. The assessment module may include an evidence indexing or annotating component for location indexing of documentary evidence and time indexing of video evidence.