Compiler Guard Transformation to Control-Split Instructions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Compilers face challenges in optimizing code execution by efficiently managing deoptimization points and instruction modifications during the compilation process, which affects overall efficiency and performance.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for compiling code that involves placing guards at potential deoptimization points, transforming them into control-split instructions, and linking deoptimization instructions with symbolic frame states to optimize guard and side-effecting instruction placement, thereby enhancing compilation efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If guards are placed at multiple locations in the code section representation, then deoptimization coverage is improved, but code complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeoptimization coverageVSAvoidcode complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple guards that would otherwise be scattered throughout the code section are merged into a single unified guard structure. The guard is transformed into a control-split instruction that consolidates multiple deoptimization checkpoints into one location, reducing code complexity while maintaining comprehensive deoptimization coverage through the use of symbolic frame states that track multiple deoptimization points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

A symbolic frame state is introduced as an intermediary mechanism between the guard and multiple deoptimization points. This intermediary allows a single guard to effectively monitor and control deoptimization at multiple locations without requiring separate guard instructions at each location, thereby reducing code complexity while improving deoptimization coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If guards are relocated to a second location in the code section representation, then compilation efficiency is improved, but instruction transformation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompilation efficiencyVSAvoidinstruction transformation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The guard is transformed into a control-split instruction in advance during compilation, before code execution. This preliminary transformation consolidates multiple deoptimization checks into a single structured instruction with embedded branching logic, improving compilation efficiency by reducing the number of guard instructions while preparing the transformed structure to handle multiple deoptimization points through symbolic frame states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control-split instruction is segmented into distinct functional components: a deoptimization branch and a continue execution branch. This segmentation allows the single transformed guard to efficiently handle multiple deoptimization scenarios by directing control flow to appropriate branches, reducing compilation complexity while maintaining comprehensive deoptimization coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Speed

If a guard is transformed into a control-split instruction, then code execution efficiency is improved, but deoptimization instruction placement complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode execution efficiencyVSAvoiddeoptimization instruction placement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control-split instruction merges the guard functionality with deoptimization instruction placement logic into a single unified structure. This consolidation improves code execution efficiency by eliminating redundant guard checks while the symbolic frame state mechanism automatically manages deoptimization instruction placement at appropriate locations without requiring complex manual placement rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The symbolic frame state provides feedback mechanisms that automatically track which deoptimization points have been reached and which instructions have executed. This feedback system simplifies deoptimization instruction placement by using runtime state information to determine appropriate placement locations, reducing the complexity of static placement rules while improving execution efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9569185B2Changing de-optimization guard representation during the compilation process
Publication Date: 2017.02.14 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US9569185B2 patent drawing
  • US9569185B2 patent drawing
  • US9569185B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for compiling code includes receiving a code section representation including a guard at a location, placing, at the guard, a triggering condition, and relocating the guard from the location to a second location in the code section representation. The method also includes transforming the guard into a control-split instruction. The control-split instruction includes a deoptimization branch and a continue execution branch. The method further includes placing, at the guard, a deoptimization instruction, and selecting a symbolic frame state linked to a side-effecting instruction. The side-effecting instruction is the last side-effecting instruction before the control-split instruction. The method also includes linking the deoptimization instruction with the symbolic frame state based on the symbolic frame state being linked to the side-effecting instruction, unlinking the symbolic frame state from the side-effecting instruction, and storing the code section representation.