Compiler Interface Lookup Table Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional open systems in software development, such as .NET, incur performance costs due to the need for flexible compile-time and runtime data structures to accommodate interfaces implemented or consumed by unknown components at compile time, leading to inefficient interface implementations and resource usage.

Innovation Solution

A closed system where all software components are known to the compiler at compile time allows for optimizations such as grouping object types, collapsing singularly-implemented interfaces, statistical compression, constant-folding, and removing unused members, reducing the size and overhead of interface lookup tables.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If flexible compile-time and runtime data structures are used to accommodate unknown components, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface flexibilityVSAvoiddata structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing interface optimization during the compilation phase rather than at runtime. The compiler analyzes all interfaces and implementing objects beforehand, building optimized lookup tables that eliminate the need for complex runtime flexibility. This shifts the adaptability requirement from runtime data structures to compile-time analysis, reducing runtime complexity while maintaining interface flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If flexible runtime data structures are used to support dynamic interface implementation, then adaptability is improved, but execution speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface flexibilityVSAvoidinterface lookup speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs interface optimization in advance during compilation, analyzing all interfaces and their implementations before runtime. This preliminary action creates optimized lookup tables that eliminate complex runtime flexibility requirements, enabling both adaptability and fast execution speed simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates simplified copies of interface lookup structures that are optimized for speed. Instead of using flexible runtime data structures, it generates static lookup tables during compilation that contain pre-computed interface-to-object mappings, enabling O(1) lookup time while maintaining the ability to support multiple interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If comprehensive interface lookup tables are maintained to support all possible interfaces, then adaptability is improved, but memory consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface coverageVSAvoidmemory usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes unnecessary interface entries from lookup tables during compilation. By analyzing which interfaces are actually implemented by which objects, it eliminates empty or redundant interface slots from the data structures, maintaining full adaptability for supported interfaces while significantly reducing memory consumption by removing unused entries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent discards interfaces that are not implemented by any object in the system during compilation analysis. By identifying and removing these unused interfaces from the lookup tables, it recovers memory space while preserving adaptability for all actually-used interfaces, achieving optimal memory utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentUS8793671B2Interface optimization in a closed system
Publication Date: 2014.07.29 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US8793671B2 patent drawing
  • US8793671B2 patent drawing
  • US8793671B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Interface optimization is provided using a closed system in which all the individual software components in the system are known to the compiler at a single point in time. This knowledge enables significant opportunities to optimize the implementation of interfaces on a set of implemented objects. When code is compiled, because the compiler knows the full list of interfaces and the objects which implement the interfaces, it can improve execution and working set (i.e., recently referenced pages in a program's virtual address space) when implementing the interfaces on objects. This improvement may be realized by reducing the size of interface lookup tables which map each interface to the object types which implement that particular interface.