Personalized Dosing Algorithm for Complement Inhibitors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current personalized dosing strategies for complement inhibitors are inefficient, leading to suboptimal treatment outcomes, financial waste, and increased risk of adverse effects in patients, particularly in conditions like thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), due to lack of precise monitoring and variable drug clearance.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for determining personalized dosing schedules of complement inhibitors like eculizumab based on pre-treatment plasma sC5b-9 concentrations and body weight, using pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic markers to maintain therapeutic levels and prevent toxicity, involving real-time monitoring and adjustment of dosing intervals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If standardized dosing schedules are used for complement inhibitors, then ease of administration is improved, but treatment effectiveness deteriorates due to variable drug clearance and lack of personalized dosing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of administrationVSAvoidtreatment effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary pharmacokinetic testing before treatment to determine individualized dosing parameters. By measuring drug clearance rates and volume of distribution in advance, the system establishes personalized dosing schedules that maintain therapeutic effectiveness while simplifying ongoing administration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes dosing parameters (dose amount, frequency, duration) based on individually determined pharmacokinetic parameters such as clearance rate and volume of distribution. This allows customization of dosing schedules to match each patient's metabolic characteristics, ensuring effective treatment while maintaining ease of administration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If higher doses of complement inhibitor are administered, then treatment effectiveness is improved, but financial cost and risk of adverse effects increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoidadverse effects
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adjusts dosing parameters based on individually determined pharmacokinetic characteristics. By calculating optimal doses using measured clearance rates and volume of distribution, the system achieves effective treatment at the minimum necessary dose, avoiding both under-dosing and excessive dosing that could cause adverse effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses pharmacokinetic testing results as feedback to optimize dosing regimens. By measuring drug concentration, clearance rate, and volume of distribution, the system continuously adjusts dosing parameters to maintain therapeutic levels while minimizing toxicity and adverse effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If pharmacokinetic testing is performed to determine personalized dosing, then treatment precision is improved, but device complexity and testing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedosing precisionVSAvoidtesting complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs comprehensive pharmacokinetic testing before treatment begins, establishing all necessary dosing parameters in advance. This preliminary action captures the complexity upfront, allowing for simplified personalized dosing schedules during actual treatment administration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex ongoing monitoring and adjustment mechanisms with upfront pharmacokinetic testing. By determining clearance rates and volume of distribution through initial testing, the system eliminates the need for continuous complex monitoring during treatment, substituting mechanical/operational complexity with initial analytical measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20240124566A1Dosing algorithm for complement inhibitor
Publication Date: 2024.04.18 CHILDRENS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENT CINCINNATI
  • US20240124566A1 patent drawing
  • US20240124566A1 patent drawing
  • US20240124566A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described are methods and systems for the treatment of individuals having a disorder characterized by complement system dysregulation. The described methods and systems may be used for a variety of purposes, including for example, establishing one or both of a general or personalized dosing schedule for treatment using a complement inhibitor, establishing a dosage schedule sufficient to maintain an effective amount of complement inhibitor, establishing general dosing schedules for novel complement modifying agents and identifying a treatment regimen and/or dose eliminating the possibility of under dosing medication, and treatment regimen and/or dose for reducing or preventing toxicity in a patient.