Complementary Logic Gate for Precise CMOS Signal Symmetrization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for balancing complementary switching signals in CMOS technology are not production-stable, increase energy consumption, and can lead to accuracy reduction and current peaks, especially under high accuracy requirements, due to the inability to generate mutually inverse switching signals without delays and transistor mismatch.

Innovation Solution

A logic gate system comprising AND and OR gates implemented with complementary transistors, where the output is only activated by mutually inverse input signals, allowing for precise signal balancing without time loss, and can be scaled for load requirements using standard CMOS transistors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If transfer gates or transmission gates are used to delay switching signals for symmetrization, then propagation delay difference is reduced, but energy consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepropagation delay differenceVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the logical parameters of the input signals rather than using physical delay elements. By detecting when inputs are logically complementary (one high, one low) and only then activating the output, the circuit achieves symmetrization without energy-intensive delay gates. This parameter-based approach replaces time-based delay mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If ring oscillators or multiple inverters are used to balance switching signals, then propagation times are synchronized, but current spikes are generated that disrupt other circuit parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepropagation time synchronizationVSAvoidcurrent spikes
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The circuit uses the logical states of the input signals themselves to control the output activation. The output is enabled only when inputs are complementary, allowing the circuit to self-regulate without external current spikes. The logical complementarity detection inherently prevents harmful current transients.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of time

If transistor driver strength matching is used to symmetrize switching signals, then propagation delay is balanced, but manufacturing tolerances cause instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepropagation delay balanceVSAvoidmanufacturing stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of trying to make transistors identical (direct matching), the patent uses their complementarity (inversion). By designing the circuit to respond to logically complementary input states, it exploits the inherent inverse relationship between paired transistors, making the system robust against manufacturing variations rather than sensitive to them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Measurement precision

If design centering and simulation are used to compensate for transistor mismatches, then accuracy is improved, but the solution is not stable in manufacturing and increases complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal balancing accuracyVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential requirement for symmetrization - logical complementarity detection - from complex compensation mechanisms. By focusing only on detecting when inputs are logically inverse, it removes the need for elaborate simulation-based design centering and manufacturing compensation, achieving accuracy through simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP2901552B1Logic gate for the symmetrization of at least two input signals and a logic gate system
Publication Date: 2019.10.16 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP2901552B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2901552B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2901552B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

The invention relates to a logic gate (30) for the symmetrization of at least two input signals, which comprises a non-inverting input (11), an inverting input (12) and an output (19). The value present on the output (19) corresponds to the inverse of the value present on the inverting input (12). According to the invention, the output (19) is activated only when the value present on the non-inverting input (11) likewise corresponds to the inverse of the value present on the inverting input (12). The invention further relates to a logic gate system which comprises at least two logic gates (30).