Completion System Sliding Sleeve Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The deployment and operation of completion systems in wellbores are complex and costly, often requiring multiple trips and involving numerous components like annular flow isolation valves and packers, which complicate sand control applications and increase rig time.

Innovation Solution

A simplified deployment methodology using mechanical flow isolation valves and sliding sleeves, which allow for two or three trip completions, reducing hardware and enabling efficient sand control by eliminating certain conventional features like annular flow isolation valves and polished bore receptacles, and facilitating fluid circulation and well control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional completion systems use annular flow isolation valves and multiple trips for deployment, then fluid control capability is improved, but device complexity and rig time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid control capabilityVSAvoidhardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes annular flow isolation valves and polished bore receptacles from the completion system, retaining only mechanical flow isolation valves. This extraction of unnecessary components reduces device complexity while maintaining essential fluid control capabilities through the retained mechanical valves and sliding sleeves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The sliding sleeve mechanism serves multiple functions: it acts as both a flow isolation device and a means for deploying the completion system. By combining these functions into a single component, the system reduces the number of separate components needed, thereby reducing complexity while maintaining operational capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If conventional completion systems deploy multiple trips with distinct sections, then placement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplacement precisionVSAvoidrig time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple completion sections into a single integrated assembly that can be deployed in one trip. The sliding sleeve mechanism allows different functional sections to be pre-assembled and deployed together, eliminating the need for multiple separate trips while maintaining proper placement through the integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The completion system is pre-assembled with all necessary components (sand screens, flow isolation valves, sliding sleeves) configured before deployment. This preliminary assembly allows the entire system to be installed in fewer trips, reducing rig time while ensuring proper placement configuration is achieved before entering the wellbore.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If conventional completion systems use multiple trips and numerous components, then operational control is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational controlVSAvoiddeployment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By removing unnecessary components such as annular flow isolation valves and polished bore receptacles, the system reduces the number of operations required during deployment and commissioning. This extraction streamlines the deployment process, improving productivity while the retained mechanical valves and sliding sleeves maintain sufficient operational control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameter from multiple trips to one or two trips by modifying the deployment methodology. This parameter change in the number of trips directly improves productivity while the sliding sleeve mechanism and mechanical valves maintain the necessary operational control for well completion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10370938B2Fluid loss control completion system and methodology
Publication Date: 2019.08.06 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US10370938B2 patent drawing
  • US10370938B2 patent drawing
  • US10370938B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A technique provides a simplified and cost-effective approach for deployment and operation of completion systems. The construction of the overall completion system and the deployment methodology provide an efficient approach for placement and operation of completion systems in a variety of wellbores. In many applications, the system and methodology may be used for sand control applications in which the completion equipment comprises sand control features, such as sand screens deployed along well zones.