Complex Oxide Coatings for Chlorine and Fluorine Plasma Erosion Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current semiconductor processing chamber coatings fail to effectively resist both fluorine and chlorine plasma erosion, leading to particle generation and wet cleaning issues, and lack sufficient dielectric strength, which compromises the purity and functionality of semiconductor devices.

Innovation Solution

The use of plasma-sprayed complex oxide coatings with ABO and ABCO compositions, where A, B, and C represent various metals, providing improved resistance to plasma erosion and wet corrosion, along with a bonding layer to enhance tensile bond strength, and maintaining low ppm levels of trace elements for reduced contamination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If Al2O3 coatings are used to resist chlorine plasma erosion, then erosion resistance is improved, but fluorine plasma causes rapid etching and particle generation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechlorine plasma erosion resistanceVSAvoidparticle generation from fluorine plasma etching
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite oxide coatings combining multiple metal oxides (e.g., rare earth oxides like Y2O3, Gd2O3, Lu2O3 with other oxides) to achieve simultaneous resistance to both chlorine and fluorine plasma erosion. This composite approach allows the coating to provide chlorine plasma erosion resistance while preventing the rapid etching and particle generation caused by fluorine plasma that plagues single-component Al2O3 coatings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the chemical composition parameters of the coating by incorporating rare earth oxides and adjusting the oxide ratios to optimize plasma resistance. By changing the compositional parameters of the coating material, the system achieves enhanced stability against both fluorine and chlorine plasma chemistries while minimizing particle generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If Y2O3 coatings are used to resist fluorine plasma erosion, then erosion resistance is improved, but chlorine plasma causes rapid etching and coating delamination occurs during wet cleaning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluorine plasma erosion resistanceVSAvoidparticle generation and coating delamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines Y2O3 with other metal oxides to create composite coatings that maintain fluorine plasma resistance while adding chlorine plasma stability and wet cleaning durability. The composite structure prevents the delamination and particle generation issues associated with pure Y2O3 coatings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates coatings with differentiated functional layers or regions where rare earth oxides provide plasma resistance while other oxide components enhance chemical stability and adhesion. This local quality differentiation allows different parts of the coating to address specific challenges: fluorine resistance, chlorine stability, and wet cleaning durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If single oxide coatings are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but resistance to both fluorine and chlorine plasma cannot be achieved simultaneously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating application simplicityVSAvoiddual plasma erosion resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite oxide coatings that integrate multiple metal oxides into a single coating layer or multi-layer structure. This approach maintains manufacturing simplicity by using established thermal spray or CVD techniques while achieving the complex performance requirement of simultaneous fluorine and chlorine plasma resistance through the synergistic combination of oxide materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The complex oxide coatings significantly reduce plasma erosion rates and wet cleaning contamination, maintaining high purity and extending the life of chamber components while preventing particle generation and electrical malfunctions.

Implementation Method 1

plasma-sprayed complex oxide coatings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma spray: Plasma Spray

Implementation Method 2

improved resistance to plasma erosion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma erosion resistance: Erosion

Implementation Method 3

a bonding layer to enhance tensile bond strength

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBonding: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentEP3443136B1Coated semiconductor processing members having chlorine and fluorine plasma erosion resistance and complex oxide coatings therefor
Publication Date: 2023.04.26 FM IND INC
  • EP3443136B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3443136B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3443136B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A semiconductor processing member is provided, including a body and a plasma spray coating provided on the body. The coating is an ABO or ABCO complex oxide solid solution composition, where A, B and C are selected from the group consisting of La, Zr, Ce, Gd, Y, Yb and Si, and O is an oxide. The coating imparts both chlorine and fluorine plasma erosion resistance, reduces particle generation during plasma etching, and prevents spalling of the coating during wet cleaning of the semiconductor processing member.