Compliance Server Change Correlation for Policy Test Failures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current compliance assessment methods fail to effectively correlate changes in computer network nodes with remediation processes, leading to incomplete or inaccurate compliance reporting and potential unnecessary changes.

Innovation Solution

A system where a compliance server, configured with compliance logic, detects changes in nodes and correlates them with remediation processes by storing change data in a database, generating event notifications, and applying compliance policies to ensure compliance, including the execution of remediation scripts and correlation of changes with remediation processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If remediation processes are executed to fix policy test failures, then compliance status is improved, but false positive test failures may occur due to uncorrelated changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance assessment accuracyVSAvoidchange attribution information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring changes in nodes and correlating them with remediation processes. When a change is detected, the system checks whether it correlates with any remediation process, and this feedback information is used to adjust compliance test results accordingly, preventing false positives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary correlation mechanism that sits between change detection and compliance assessment. This intermediary component analyzes whether detected changes are related to remediation processes, and only then allows the compliance assessment to proceed, thereby preventing false positive failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If compliance monitoring is performed without correlating changes to remediation, then monitoring simplicity is maintained, but compliance reporting accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring process simplicityVSAvoidcompliance reporting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by automatically detecting changes, correlating them with remediation processes, and adjusting compliance assessments without requiring manual intervention. The compliance monitoring system serves itself by autonomously determining whether changes are related to remediation activities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by establishing a correlation framework before compliance assessments are performed. Change correlation data is collected and prepared in advance, so when compliance tests are run, the system already has the information needed to accurately interpret results without adding complexity to the monitoring process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If change correlation with remediation processes is implemented, then false positive failures are reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance test accuracyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges change correlation functionality with the existing compliance assessment system. Instead of creating a completely separate system, the correlation mechanism is integrated into the compliance monitoring architecture, allowing both functions to work together within a unified framework and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements multi-functionality by designing the correlation mechanism to serve multiple purposes: it tracks changes, correlates them with remediation processes, and uses this information to adjust compliance assessments. This universal approach allows a single component to perform multiple functions rather than requiring separate systems for each task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9026646B2Methods and apparatus for remediating policy test failures, including correlating changes to remediation processes
Publication Date: 2015.05.05 TRIPWIRE INC
  • US9026646B2 patent drawing
  • US9026646B2 patent drawing
  • US9026646B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are methods, systems, and articles associated with correlating detected changes within a computer network with remediation processes performed in response to policy test failures. In embodiments, on determination that a failure of a policy test has occurred within a computer network having a number of nodes, a remediation process may be executed to remediate the failure. Change at a node may be detected. Further, the detected change may be correlated with the execution of the remediation process, and the correlation may be identified.